Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026
Mouse Model of Surgical Uterine Injury and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes
Published on: June 27, 2025
Optimizing an algorithm for the identification and classification of pregnancy outcomes in German claims data
Nadine Wentzell1, Tania Schink1, Ulrike Haug1,2
1Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Purpose:
For studying drug utilization and safety in pregnancy based on administrative health care data, the reliable identification and classification of pregnancy outcomes in the data is essential. We aimed to optimize an existing algorithm for the identification and classification of pregnancy outcomes in the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (GePaRD) with a particular focus on births.
Methods:
We reconsidered all codes used by the original algorithm and applied it to data of GePaRD from 2006 to 2014. Longitudinal records of pregnancies were used to identify targets for enhancing the algorithm's specificity. We checked the plausibility of the results, eg, regarding the age distribution of persons with pregnancy outcomes. Based on 20 longitudinal records of pregnancies, we compared the outcome classification by clinical experts with the results of the modified algorithm.
Results:
Our algorithm identified 1 235 261 pregnancy outcomes in the database, with the majority (94%) being live births, classified as preterm (10%), term (78%), and (12%) births after the expected delivery date. The median age of pregnant women was 32 years (Q1 28; Q3 35). Implausible sequence of outcomes (for example, an induced abortion within a pregnancy categorized as ending in a live birth) were rare (0.03%). The case profile review by clinical experts resulted in the same outcome type and date as the algorithm in 95%.
Conclusions:
Our algorithm led to plausible results regarding the identification and classification of pregnancy outcomes. It will be an important foundation for studies on drug utilization and drug safety during pregnancy based on GePaRD.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:28Methods of Classification and Identification
01:11Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
01:24Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
01:19Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
01:21Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
01:12Trial and Error and Algorithm