Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale PFO: An Intervention Sequence
Published on: December 23, 2022
Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke: diagnosis and updates in secondary stroke prevention
Kristy Yuan1, Scott Eric Kasner1
1Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Insights
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure benefits select cryptogenic stroke patients under 60. Careful patient selection is key for stroke prevention and future clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is prevalent, particularly in cryptogenic stroke patients.
- PFO's role in paradoxical embolism and stroke causation is debated.
- Percutaneous PFO closure is increasingly considered for secondary stroke prevention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current evidence on PFO closure for secondary stroke prevention.
- To identify patient selection criteria for optimal benefit.
- To inform future guideline statements and device approvals.
Main Methods:
- Review of current scientific evidence and clinical trial data.
- Analysis of patient characteristics associated with stroke risk and closure benefit.
- Evaluation of the impact of patient selection on outcomes.
Main Results:
- Benefit from PFO closure is contingent upon careful patient selection.
- Ideal candidates are under 60 with few vascular risk factors and embolic stroke.
- Thorough evaluation is necessary to confirm cryptogenic stroke etiology.
Conclusions:
- Patient selection is crucial for successful PFO closure in stroke prevention.
- Future trials and guidelines should emphasize precise patient selection criteria.
- Optimizing patient selection will enhance clinical decision-making and trial efficacy.
Abstract:
The patent foramen ovale (PFO), given its high prevalence in the general population and especially in patients with cryptogenic stroke, has long generated investigation and debate on its propensity for stroke by paradoxical embolism and its management for stroke prevention. The pendulum has swung for percutaneous PFO closure for secondary stroke prevention in cryptogenic stroke. Based on a review of current evidence, the benefit from PFO closure relies on careful patient selection: those under the age of 60 years with few to no vascular risk factors and embolic-appearing stroke deemed cryptogenic after thorough evaluation. As these data look towards influencing guideline statements and device approvals in the future, patient selection remains the crucial ingredient for clinical decision making and future trials.
Related Concept Videos
Regulation of Stroke Volume
Preload refers to the degree of stretch on the heart before it contracts. It's analogous to the stretching of a rubber band; the more it's stretched, the more forcefully it snaps back. This concept is encapsulated in the Frank-Starling law of the...
Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume
In an average resting adult male, the typical cardiac...
Cardiac Output II: Effect of Stroke Volume on Cardiac Output
Preload
Preload refers to the initial elongation of the cardiac myocytes before contraction and is related to the volume of blood filling the heart at the end of diastole, or end-diastolic volume. The...
Secondary Active Transport
Secondary Healthcare System
Primary and Secondary Growth in Roots and Shoots

