Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.6K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.6K
Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

46.0K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
46.0K
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

12.4K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
12.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Towards Conversational AI for Disease Management.

Nature·2026
Same author

Advancing conversational diagnostic AI with multimodal reasoning.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

Consumer Understanding of Skin Concerns With an AI-Powered Informational Tool.

JAMA dermatology·2026
Same author

Increasing psychopharmacology clinical trial success rates with digital measures and biomarkers: Future methods.

NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience·2025
Same author

PolyPath: Adapting a Large Multimodal Model for Multislide Pathology Report Generation.

Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc·2025
Same author

A personal health large language model for sleep and fitness coaching.

Nature medicine·2025
Same journal

Degeneration of Interpericyte Tunneling Nanotubes Can Occur in the Absence of Pericyte Loss in Diabetic Retina Disease.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Unsupervised Clustering for POAG Phenotyping.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Myd88 Deficiency Accelerates Retinal Degeneration and Alters Microglial Dynamics in a Mouse Model of Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Sigma 1 Receptor Activation Coordinates Metabolic Stress Responses to Protect Retinal Vasculature in Ischemic Retinopathy.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

On the Misuse of Virus-Transformed Human Corneal Epithelial Cells as Surrogates for Normal Cells.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Human Crystallin Variation and Cataract.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Quantitative Fundus Autofluorescence for the Evaluation of Retinal Diseases
07:22

Quantitative Fundus Autofluorescence for the Evaluation of Retinal Diseases

Published on: March 11, 2016

11.9K

Deep Learning for Predicting Refractive Error From Retinal Fundus Images.

Avinash V Varadarajan1, Ryan Poplin1, Katy Blumer1

  • 1Google Research, Google, Inc., Mountain View, California, United States.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|July 20, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deep learning accurately predicts refractive error from retinal fundus images, a novel application for medical imaging. This advancement offers new possibilities for non-invasive eye diagnostics.

More Related Videos

Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia
09:17

Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia

Published on: November 6, 2017

22.3K
Smartphone Fundus Photography
05:51

Smartphone Fundus Photography

Published on: July 6, 2017

40.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Quantitative Fundus Autofluorescence for the Evaluation of Retinal Diseases
07:22

Quantitative Fundus Autofluorescence for the Evaluation of Retinal Diseases

Published on: March 11, 2016

11.9K
Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia
09:17

Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia

Published on: November 6, 2017

22.3K
Smartphone Fundus Photography
05:51

Smartphone Fundus Photography

Published on: July 6, 2017

40.2K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Refractive error is a common vision impairment.
  • Current methods for refractive error assessment can be invasive or require specialized equipment.
  • Retinal fundus imaging is a widely available diagnostic tool.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the potential of deep learning algorithms to predict refractive error from retinal fundus images.
  • To assess the accuracy and generalizability of a deep learning model for refractive error estimation.

Main Methods:

  • A deep learning algorithm was trained on a large dataset of retinal fundus images (226,870 images) from UK Biobank and Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS).
  • The model utilized an attention mechanism to identify image features correlated with refractive error.
  • Performance was validated on independent datasets from UK Biobank (24,007 images) and AREDS (15,750 images).

Main Results:

  • The deep learning model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.56 diopters on UK Biobank data and 0.91 diopters on AREDS data.
  • These results significantly outperformed baseline models that predicted the population mean (MAE of 1.81 and 1.63 diopters, respectively).
  • Attention maps indicated the foveal region as a key area for prediction, alongside other contributing retinal features.

Conclusions:

  • Deep learning can accurately estimate refractive error from retinal fundus images, demonstrating a novel application for AI in medical diagnostics.
  • This approach has the potential to enable non-invasive and efficient refractive error assessment.
  • The study highlights the capability of deep learning to extract previously unrecognized information from medical images.