Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Labor Management Through Electromyometrial Imaging for Understanding Uterine Contractions
Published on: May 26, 2023
Uterine morcellation and survival in uterine sarcomas
Michael Bretthauer1, Jeanne Mette Goderstad2, Magnus Løberg3
1Institute of Health and Society, Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Transplantation Medicine and K.G. Jebsen Center for Colorectal Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo Norway; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Background:
There is concern but no solid evidence that morcellation during laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy may cause abdominal spread and thereby impaired prognosis of incidental uterine sarcomas.
Objective:
Our purpose was to compare survival among patients with uterine sarcomas who underwent hysterectomy with or without morcellation to test the hypothesis that morcellation impairs prognosis.
Study Design:
We identified all women in Norway diagnosed with uterine sarcoma between 1953 and 2012 through national registries and retrieved data on surgical technique and morcellation by evaluation of patient files. Patients were categorised into abdominal, laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy with or without morcellation. Vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomies were introduced in 1991; our main comparison is from 1991 to 2012. We compared age-adjusted disease-specific survival of sarcoma patients treated with or without morcellation and calculated age-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and subdistribution HR (accounting for competing risk) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results:
Among 1367 patients with uterine sarcoma between 1953 and 2012 in Norway, 653 were diagnosed after 1991, and 23 of these patients (3.5%) underwent morcellation. Uterine sarcoma prevalence was 3.6 per 1000 laparoscopic hysterectomies. Mean follow-up was 6.0 years in the morcellated group and 6.9 years in the non-morcellated group. The risk of dying from uterine sarcoma after morcellation was 1.5 per 1000 procedures. Sarcoma mortality was higher in the morcellated group than in the non-morcellated group (age-adjusted HR 1.90, CI 1.05-3.44; multivariate HR, 2.50, 95% CI 0.57-10.9). Age-adjusted 10-year uterine sarcoma survival was 32.2% for women treated with morcellation compared with 57.2% for non-morcellated group (difference 25.5%; CI -55.7 to 18.1). All-cause 10-year survival was 32.2% in the morcellated group and 44.1% in the non-morcellated group (difference 11.9%; CI -40.9 to 32.7).
Conclusion:
Our results strengthen the evidence that morcellation during hysterectomy in patients with incidental uterine sarcoma may cause impaired survival. These results can guide shared decision-making in clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Uterine Tubes
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...

