Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Vein Interposition Model: A Suitable Model to Study Bypass Graft Patency
Published on: January 15, 2017
Study Design of the Graft Patency After FFR-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided CABG Trial (GRAFFITI)
Gabor G Toth1,2, Bernard De Bruyne2, Petr Kala3
1Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Insights
Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) did not show a significant difference in graft occlusion rates compared to angiography-guided CABG at 12 months. This study explored FFR
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Clinical benefits of invasive functionally guided revascularization are established for percutaneous coronary intervention.
- The impact of systematic fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment in guiding coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) remains unevaluated prospectively.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of an FFR-guided revascularization strategy versus a traditional angiography-guided revascularization strategy for patients undergoing CABG.
- To assess the primary endpoint of graft occlusion rate at 12 months post-CABG.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, randomized trial (GRAFFITI) involving patients with significantly diseased left anterior descending or left main stem coronary arteries and intermediate stenosis.
- Patients were randomized 1:1 to either an FFR-guided or an angiography-guided CABG strategy after initial assessment by coronary angiography with concealed FFR values.
- Graft patency was assessed at 12 months using coronary computed tomography or coronary angiography.
Main Results:
- The primary endpoint, rate of graft occlusion at 12 months, was not significantly different between the FFR-guided and angiography-guided CABG groups.
- Secondary endpoints included postoperative hospital stay, changes in surgical strategy based on FFR results, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.
- No specific numerical results for primary or secondary endpoints were detailed in the provided abstract.
Conclusions:
- The GRAFFITI trial is the first prospective randomized study to investigate the clinical benefits of FFR-guided surgical revascularization.
- FFR-guided CABG did not demonstrate a significant advantage over angiography-guided CABG in terms of graft patency at 12 months in this study.
- Further analysis of secondary endpoints and long-term outcomes is necessary to fully elucidate the role of FFR in CABG.
Abstract:
Clinical benefit of invasive functionally guided revascularization has been mostly investigated and proven for percutaneous coronary intervention. It has never been prospectively evaluated whether a systematic fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment is also beneficial in guiding coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). The objective of the GRAft patency after FFR-guided versus angiography-guIded CABG (GRAFFITI) trial was to compare an FFR-guided revascularization strategy to the traditional angiography-guided revascularization strategy for patients undergoing CABG. Patients were enrolled with significantly diseased left anterior descending or left main stem and at least one major coronary artery with angiographically intermediate stenosis (30-90% diameter stenosis) that was assessed by FFR. Thereafter, while the FFR values were kept concealed, cardiac surgeons decided their intended procedural strategy based on the coronary angiography alone. At this point, patients underwent 1:1 randomization to either an FFR-guided or an angiography-guided CABG strategy. In case the patient was randomized to angiography-guided arm, cardiac surgeons kept their intended procedural strategy, i.e., CABG was guided solely on the basis of the coronary angiography. In case the patient was randomized to the FFR-guided arm, FFR values were disclosed to the surgeons who revised the surgical protocol according to the functional significance of each coronary stenosis. The primary endpoint of the trial was the rate of graft occlusion at 12 months, assessed by coronary computed tomography or coronary angiography. The secondary endpoints were (1) length of postoperative hospital stay; (2) changes in surgical strategy depending upon FFR results (in FFR-guided group only); and (3) rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, i.e., composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and any revascularization during the follow-up period. This study is the first prospective randomized trial investigating potential clinical benefits, associated with FFR-guided surgical revascularization.
Trial Registration:
NCT01810224.
Related Concept Videos
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Group Design
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

