Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Direct and Indirect Culture Methods for Studying Biodegradable Implant Materials In Vitro
Published on: April 15, 2022
Schwertmannite transformation via direct or indirect electron transfer by a sulfate reducing enrichment culture
Yufei Zeng1, Han Wang1, Chuling Guo1
1School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, PR China; The Key Lab of Pollution Control and Ecosystem Restoration in Industry Clusters, Ministry of Education, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, PR China.
Abstract:
Understanding the mechanism of the microbial transformation of Fe(III)-oxyhydroxysulfate minerals is of considerable interest, because this transformation plays an important role in controlling the behaviour of toxic metals from acid mine drainage (AMD). In this study, we examined a sulfate reducing enrichment culture from AMD-contaminated sediments and predicted the possible pathway of electron transfer when incubated with schwertmannite, a common Fe(III)-oxyhydroxysulfate occurring in the AMD environment. Experiments were designed to distinguish the mechanisms by which bacteria facilitate direct (i.e., bacteria allowed to adhere to the mineral) or indirect (i.e., bacteria separated from the mineral by dialysis bag) electron transfer to reduce the mineral. The effects of adding anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS) as an exogenous electron shuttle were also investigated. Vivianite was detected as the main product of schwertmannite transformation. Reduction of sulfate and iron were more pronounced in direct treatments, while more non-reductive dissolution were observed in indirect treatments. The addition of AQDS lead to the production of more dissolved Fe2+ over 20 d than in the absence of AQDS. Microbial community composition differed in direct and indirect treatments, while the addition of AQDS did not significantly affect the community structure in each treatment. After incubation for 20 d, the growth of Desulfovibrio exceeded that of the originally dominant Citrobacter in direct treatments, while an unknown genus most closely related to Citrobacter within Enterobacteriaceae was predominant in indirect treatments. This monodominant community in indirect treatments was assumed not to transfer electron directly to schwertmannite but to rely on shuttling mechanism. PICRUSt results implied that bacteria in indirect treatment have potential to produce shuttling compounds or complexing agents. The absence of dsr genes and the putative fermentative process suggested that the Enterobacteriaceae might indirectly facilitate the dissolution and transformation of schwertmannite.
More Related Videos
10:44Translating Extracellular Electron Transfer Activities with Organic Electrochemical Transistors
Published on: January 31, 2025
09:53Micropatterning Transmission Electron Microscopy Grids to Direct Cell Positioning within Whole-Cell Cryo-Electron Tomography Workflows
Published on: September 13, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Ionic Bonding and Electron Transfer
Sulfate Attack on Concrete
Sulfates from sources like soil, groundwater, or industrial effluents...
Indirect Motor Pathways
The vestibulospinal tract originates in the vestibular nuclei of the brainstem. The vestibular system detects changes in...
Electron Transport Chains
The ETC is comprised of...
Bacterial Transformation
Griffith made an unexpected discovery when he killed the pathogenic strain and mixed its remains with the live, non-pathogenic strain. Not only did the mixture kill host mice, but it also contained living pathogenic bacteria that...
Electron Affinity