Related Experiment Videos
Neurological deterioration after lumbar puncture below complete spinal subarachnoid block.
Journal of Neurosurgery
|February 1, 1986
Summary
Lumbar puncture below a complete spinal block risks neurological deterioration. This study found a 14% incidence of downward spinal coning after lumbar puncture, highlighting risks associated with this procedure.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Neurosurgery
- Radiology
Background:
- Complete spinal subarachnoid block is a serious condition.
- Cerebrospinal fluid removal below a complete block is generally accepted to carry neurological risks.
- The precise incidence of neurological deterioration following lumbar puncture in the presence of a complete block is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the incidence of neurological deterioration after lumbar puncture in patients with a complete spinal subarachnoid block.
- To compare the risk of neurological deterioration between lumbar puncture and C1-2 puncture in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective case analysis of 100 patients with complete spinal subarachnoid block confirmed by myelography.
- Patients were divided into two groups: 50 who underwent lumbar puncture and 50 who underwent C1-2 puncture.
- Groups were matched for age, pre-myelography neurological status, block level, and disease nature.
Main Results:
- Seven out of 50 patients (14%) who underwent lumbar puncture experienced significant neurological deterioration.
- No neurological deterioration was observed in the 50 patients who underwent C1-2 puncture.
- The study identified a minimum risk of 14% for downward spinal coning after lumbar puncture below a complete spinal subarachnoid block due to a mass lesion.
Conclusions:
- Lumbar puncture below a complete spinal subarachnoid block carries a significant risk of neurological deterioration, estimated at least 14%.
- C1-2 puncture appears to be a safer alternative, with no observed deterioration in this study.
- These findings underscore the importance of considering the risks of lumbar puncture in patients with complete spinal blocks and suggest alternative approaches may be preferable.