Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comprehensive curriculum evaluation.

E L O'Neill

    The Journal of Nursing Education
    |January 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study details a comprehensive curriculum evaluation plan using formative and summative methods. Faculty involvement in this rigorous process is educational, ensuring effective teaching and learning are preserved.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Improved diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection by PCR using vaginal swabs and urine specimens compared to diagnosis by wet mount microscopy, culture, and fluorescent staining.

    Journal of clinical microbiology·1999
    Same author

    Placement of pathophysiology in the curriculum.

    Nurse educator·1987
    Same author

    Closed mitral valvotomy.

    Nursing mirror and midwives journal·1971
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Educational assessment
    • Curriculum development and evaluation

    Background:

    • Curriculum evaluation is essential for maintaining educational quality and preventing stagnation.
    • Faculty engagement in evaluation is crucial for accountability and continuous improvement.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To outline a comprehensive evaluation plan with summative and formative components.
    • To guide decision-making through robust data collection and analysis.

    Main Methods:

    • Sampling students' work for authentic assessment.
    • Utilizing simulation for evaluating learning outcomes.
    • Testing actual student learning to validate curriculum effectiveness.

    Main Results:

    • The evaluation process, though rigorous and requiring revision, provides valuable data for decision-making.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Faculty involvement is perceived as educational and satisfying, fostering a sense of responsibility.
  • A structured evaluation system enhances security by preserving effective practices and eliminating ineffective ones.

    • Conclusions:

    • A well-designed curriculum evaluation system is vital for preserving effective teaching and learning.
    • Continuous, constructive evaluation is necessary to prevent educational practices from becoming rote.
    • Faculty commitment to evaluation, despite its demanding nature, yields significant educational benefits.