Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Conventional and Threshold-Tracking Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Tests for Single-handed Operation
Published on: August 16, 2021
Conventional or threshold-hunting TMS? A tale of two SICIs
John Cirillo1, John G Semmler2, Ronan A Mooney1
1Department of Exercise Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Centre for Brain Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Background:
In human primary motor cortex (M1), the paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigm of short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) can be expressed conventionally as a percent change in the relative amplitude of a conditioned motor evoked potential to non-conditioned; or adaptive threshold-hunting a target motor evoked potential amplitude in the absence or presence of a conditioning stimulus, and noting the relative change in stimulation intensity. The suitability of each approach may depend on the induced current direction, which probe separate M1 interneuronal populations.
Objective:
To examine the influence of conditioning stimulus intensity, interstimulus interval (ISI) and current direction for adaptive threshold-hunting and conventional SICI using equivalent TMS intensities.
Methods:
In 16 participants (21-32 years), SICI was examined using adaptive threshold-hunting and conventional paired-pulse TMS with posterior-anterior and anterior-posterior stimulation, ISIs of 2 and 3 ms, and a range of conditioning intensities.
Results:
Inhibition with adaptive threshold-hunting was greater for anterior-posterior stimulation with an ISI of 3 ms (23.6 ± 9.0%) compared with 2 ms (7.5 ± 7.8%, P < 0.001) and posterior-anterior stimulation at both ISIs (2 ms 8.6 ± 8.7%, 3 ms 5.9 ± 4.8%; P < 0.001). There was an association between inhibition obtained with conventional and adaptive threshold-hunting for posterior-anterior but not anterior-posterior stimulation (2 ms only, r = 0.68, P = 0.03).
Conclusions:
More inhibition was evident with anterior-posterior than posterior-anterior current for both adaptive threshold-hunting and conventional paired-pulse TMS. Assessment of SICI with anterior-posterior stimulation was not directly comparable between the two approaches. However, the amount of inhibition was dependent on conditioning stimulus intensity and ISI for both SICI techniques.
Related Concept Videos
Sign Convention
The normal force acts perpendicular to the beam's cross-section and can...
Enolate Mechanism Conventions
Predator-Prey Interactions
Robbers Cave
Molecular Models
Quantifying Work

