Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
Cost-Effectiveness of Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Using a Propensity-matched Cohort
Janet Baack Kukreja1, Michael J Metcalfe1, Wei Qiao2
1Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Background:
Health-related quality of life is important for patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC).
Objective:
To determine the cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted RC (RARC) compared to open cystectomy (OC) for bladder cancer and factors that contribute to cost-effectiveness.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
A decision analytic model was used to compare health-related quality of life and medical costs for RARCs with intracorporeal urinary diversion and OCs performed between 2007 and 2015.
Outcome Measurements And Statistical Analysis:
Propensity matching was performed among 1322 cases to yield a final cohort of 100 RARC and 96 ORC cases. Probabilities were obtained from the clinical study data, while quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and health utility values were derived from the literature. A complication, readmission, or transfusion was included in the 90-d time horizon model.
Results And Limitations:
There were no differences between the groups in patient demographics, pathologic staging, or length of stay. Multivariable analysis revealed that the RARC group had fewer transfusions and complications compared to the OC group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $2969. RARC cost $2969 less per QALY when compared to OC. While RARC was $17000 more expensive, it also associated with an increase of 0.32 QALYs. One-way sensitivity analysis identified RARC as the preferred strategy if a complication can be prevented 74% of the time. RARC is preferred as long as it is 70% effective in preventing a transfusion. Two-way sensitivity analysis showed that as long as RARC can prevent complications and transfusions, it is the preferred cost-effective treatment when compared to OC. The study is limited by the omission of a societal perspective and the lack of health utility values for RC.
Conclusions:
RARC is cost-effective compared to OC when the rates of complications and transfusions are significantly lower.
Patient Summary:
Bladder removal via a robotic approach is more expensive, but it improves health-related quality of life. Robotic surgery is cost-effective compared to an open approach for bladder removal if there are low rates of complications and blood transfusion.
More Related Videos
07:22Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
Published on: June 13, 2025
12:34Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction
Published on: January 3, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Radical Reactivity: Steric Effects
Along with electronic...
Radical Reactivity: Concentration Effects
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
Radical Reactivity: Nucleophilic Radicals
Radicals
Radical Reactivity: Electrophilic Radicals