Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
Published on: July 24, 2010
Neurovascular coupling response to cognitive examination in healthy controls: a multivariate analysis
Lucy Beishon1, Claire A L Williams1, Thompson G Robinson1,2
1Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Cognitive testing with transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) has been used to assess neurovascular coupling (NVC), but few studies address its multiple contributions. Subcomponent analysis considers the relative myogenic (resistance area product, RAP) and metabolic (critical closing pressure (CrCP)) contributors. The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in subcomponents that occur with cognitive stimulation with the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE-III) in healthy controls. Healthy volunteers underwent continuous recording of bilateral TCD, heart rate (HR, three-lead ECG), end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2 , capnography), and mean arterial pressure (MAP, Finometer). The study comprised a 5-min baseline recording, followed by all 20 paradigms from the ACE-III. The cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFv) response was decomposed into the relative contributions (subcomponents); VBP (MAP), VCrCP (CrCP), and VRAP (RAP). Data are presented as peak population normalized mean changes from baseline, and median area under the curve (AUC). Forty bilateral datasets were obtained (27 female, 37 right hand dominant). VBP increased at task initiation in all paradigms but differed between tasks (range (SD): 4.06 (8.92)-16.04 (12.23) %, P < 0.05). HR, but not ETCO2 , also differed significantly (P < 0.05). Changes in VRAP reflected changes in MAP, but in some paradigms atypical responses were seen. VCrCP AUC varied significantly within paradigm sections (range [SD]: 18.4 [24.17] to 244.21 [243.21] %*s, P < 0.05). All paradigms demonstrated changes in subcomponents with cognitive stimulation, and can be ranked based on their relative presumed metabolic demand. The integrity of NVC requires further investigation in patient populations.
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Dissonance
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
G-protein Coupled Receptors
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Couple
A typical example to understand this concept is tightening a bolt with a lug wrench. A...

