Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

A Simple Bioassay for the Evaluation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors
Published on: March 15, 2016
Vascular endothelial growth factor gene transfer therapy for coronary artery disease: A systematic review and
Rong Yuan1,2, Qiqi Xin2, Weili Shi2
1Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Insights
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene therapy shows promise in reducing serious cardiac events for coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. While safe and effective, particularly with adenoviral vectors, it did not impact mortality or angina scores.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Gene Therapy
- Regenerative Medicine
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) poses a significant global health burden.
- The efficacy of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene transfer for improving myocardial ischemia and treating CAD remains unclear.
- Proangiogenesis mechanisms are central to exploring novel therapeutic strategies for CAD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing VEGF gene therapy with standard treatments in CAD patients.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of VEGF gene therapy in improving cardiac outcomes.
- To evaluate the impact of VEGF gene therapy on mortality, serious cardiac events, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and angina.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to May 2018.
- Inclusion of RCTs comparing VEGF gene therapy and standard care for CAD.
- Meta-analysis using fixed and random effects models with primary outcomes of mortality and serious cardiac events, and secondary outcomes including LVEF and angina.
Main Results:
- 14 RCTs involving 524 studies were included in the meta-analysis.
- VEGF gene therapy significantly decreased the risk of serious cardiac events (RR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.84; P=0.005).
- A slight improvement in follow-up LVEF (WMD: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.28, 2.62) was observed; adenoviral vectors showed enhanced benefits for cardiac events and LVEF, but mortality and angina scores were unchanged.
Conclusions:
- VEGF gene therapy demonstrates safety and efficacy in reducing serious cardiac events in CAD patients.
- Adenoviral vector-based VEGF gene therapy offers greater potential benefits.
- Further research is warranted to fully elucidate the therapeutic potential of VEGF gene therapy in cardiovascular disease.
Aim:
It is not clear whether treatment by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene transfer can improve myocardial ischemia through a proangiogenesis mechanism and is effective against coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared VEGF gene therapy and standard treatments in CAD.
Methods:
We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases and relevant references for RCTs (published up to May 2018; no language restrictions) and performed meta-analysis using both fixed and random effects models. Our primary outcome measures were mortality and serious cardiac events. The secondary outcome measures were follow-up left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), change in LVEF (ΔLVEF), and angina outcomes. The registration number is CRD42017058430.
Results:
Of 524 identified studies, 14 were eligible and were included in our analysis. At a mean follow-up of 6 months, VEGF gene therapy demonstrated a decreased risk of serious cardiac events (11.7% vs 21.2%, relative risk: 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37, 0.84; P = 0.005) and a slight improvement in follow-up LVEF (weighted mean difference: 1.95; 95%CI: 1.28, 2.62). Furthermore, VEGF gene therapy using adenoviral vectors showed more potential benefit in terms of the risk of serious cardiac events, ΔLVEF, and Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class. Nevertheless, mortality and angina frequency scores were not different.
Conclusions:
Vascular endothelial growth factor gene therapy appears to be safe and effective regarding serious cardiac events, with greater benefit when using adenoviral vectors. This meta-analysis highlights the need for further exploration in these areas.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Gene Therapy
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures

