Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mass Analyzers: Overview01:13

Mass Analyzers: Overview

1.8K
The mass analyzer is a crucial component of the mass spectrometer. In the ionization chamber, the vaporized sample is bombarded with a high-energy electron beam to generate a radical cation and further fragment into neutral molecules, radicals, and cations. A series of negatively charged accelerator plates accelerate the cations into the mass analyzer. The mass analyzer separates ions according to their mass-to-charge (m/z) ratios and then directs them to the detector. The common types of mass...
1.8K
Mass Analyzers: Common Types01:19

Mass Analyzers: Common Types

1.6K
The quadrupole mass analyzer consists of four cylindrical metal rods arranged in a diamond carrying a DC voltage and a radio-frequency AC voltage. The motion of ions through the quadrupole depends on the field strength, causing only ions of a certain m/z to resonate successfully and strike the detector at a given field strength. Though the transmission rate for these analyzers is high, the exact elemental composition of the sample is not determined because of low resolution; however, they are...
1.6K
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

984
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
984
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA01:12

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA

1.7K
Analysis of Variance, or ANOVA, is a powerful statistical technique used to analyze parametric data, primarily in research and experimental studies. It's designed to compare the means of two or more groups, assisting researchers in identifying any significant differences between these group means. There are two main types of ANOVA based on the complexity of the analysis: one-way and two-way.
One-way ANOVA is applied when a single independent variable or factor is scrutinized. It compares...
1.7K
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment01:17

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

327
Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...
327
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

7.0K
In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
7.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effectiveness of 2 behavioral interventions for voluntary opioid dosage reduction in patients prescribed high-dosage opioids for chronic pain.

Pain·2026
Same author

Association of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid with underlying cancer type: A lack of association with cancer tissue <i>COL17A1</i> mutations and dysregulation.

JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health·2026
Same author

Association Between Genetic Variants and Circulating Biomarkers of Extracellular Matrix Remodelling in Indian Patients With Acute and Recurrent Myocardial Infarction.

Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis·2025
Same author

Relapsing Primary Cutaneous Nocardiosis in a Healthy Pediatric Patient.

Pediatric dermatology·2025
Same author

Lung ultrasound score and its correlation with modified Ross score in infants with left to right shunt.

Cardiology in the young·2025
Same author

Soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products and its role in cardiovascular risk assessment in hyperglycemia - A study in North India.

Journal of family medicine and primary care·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Novel Method for Comprehensive Cell Component Analysis of Cerebral Blood Clots
06:12

Author Spotlight: A Novel Method for Comprehensive Cell Component Analysis of Cerebral Blood Clots

Published on: July 21, 2023

1.1K

Analyzing Medicare payments to otologists.

T Edward Imbery1, Brian D Nicholas, Parul Goyal

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

Ear, Nose, & Throat Journal
|July 24, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Otologists receive significantly lower Medicare payments and have a higher charge-to-payment ratio compared to otolaryngologists, despite similar submitted charges. This impacts otologist reimbursement for services.

More Related Videos

Analyzing Oxygen Consumption Rate in Primary Cultured Mouse Neonatal Cardiomyocytes Using an Extracellular Flux Analyzer
11:26

Analyzing Oxygen Consumption Rate in Primary Cultured Mouse Neonatal Cardiomyocytes Using an Extracellular Flux Analyzer

Published on: February 13, 2019

9.2K
Analyzing Dendritic Morphology in Columns and Layers
08:41

Analyzing Dendritic Morphology in Columns and Layers

Published on: March 23, 2017

9.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Novel Method for Comprehensive Cell Component Analysis of Cerebral Blood Clots
06:12

Author Spotlight: A Novel Method for Comprehensive Cell Component Analysis of Cerebral Blood Clots

Published on: July 21, 2023

1.1K
Analyzing Oxygen Consumption Rate in Primary Cultured Mouse Neonatal Cardiomyocytes Using an Extracellular Flux Analyzer
11:26

Analyzing Oxygen Consumption Rate in Primary Cultured Mouse Neonatal Cardiomyocytes Using an Extracellular Flux Analyzer

Published on: February 13, 2019

9.2K
Analyzing Dendritic Morphology in Columns and Layers
08:41

Analyzing Dendritic Morphology in Columns and Layers

Published on: March 23, 2017

9.8K

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Health Economics
  • Medical Billing

Background:

  • Otologists specialize in ear diseases, while otolaryngologists have a broader scope including the nose and throat.
  • Understanding payment disparities is crucial for healthcare providers and policymakers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare Medicare payments and billing practices between otologists and otolaryngologists.
  • To analyze differences in submitted charges, actual payments, and fee multipliers.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) payment data.
  • Comparison of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, charges, and payments for otologists and otolaryngologists.
  • Statistical analysis including unequal variance two-tailed t tests.

Main Results:

  • Otologists received significantly lower mean payments ($56,191) than otolaryngologists ($77,275).
  • Otologists exhibited a significantly higher mean charge-to-payment ratio (3.87) compared to otolaryngologists (2.91).
  • Evaluation and management codes dominated billing; allergy and audiology services showed specific utilization patterns.

Conclusions:

  • Otologists face financial disadvantages in Medicare reimbursement compared to general otolaryngologists.
  • The higher fee multiplier for otologists suggests potential underpayment relative to their submitted charges.
  • Further research into the drivers of these payment disparities is warranted.