Uncertainty in Estimates, Incentives, and Emission Reductions in REDD+ Projects
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
Published on: September 7, 2019
Jichuan Sheng1,2, Weihai Zhou3, Alex de Sherbinin4
1Institute of Climate Change and Public Policy, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, 219 Ningliu Road, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, China. jsheng@nuist.edu.cn.
Abstract:
The accurate monitoring and measurement of emission reductions is a critical step in Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+). However, the existence of uncertainty in emission reduction estimates affects the performance of REDD+ projects. We assert that incentive could be a valuable policy tool for reducing monitoring errors and transaction costs. Using Stackelberg models and simulation research, this paper examines the effects of uncertainty and incentive on performance and stakeholder benefits of REDD+ projects. Finally, the uncertainties in REDD+ projects are further discussed, and equilibrium errors, emission reductions, and stakeholder benefits in different scenarios are compared. The results show that errors do affect the measured value of carbon emissions and compensation payments. However, incentive for investors can reduce monitoring errors and improve the performance of REDD+ projects. Therefore, in the future, incentive should be provided to investors rather than landholders.
Related Concept Videos
The Uncertainty Principle
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Emission Spectra
Uncertainty: Overview
Fischer Projections
Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures

