Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

A Porcine Model of Acute Autologous Pulmonary Embolism
Published on: September 6, 2024
Comorbidity burden conditions the prognostic performance of D-dimer in elderly patients with acute pulmonary embolism
Hernan Polo Friz1, Valentina Pezzetti2, Annalisa Orenti3
1Internal Medicine, Medical Department, Vimercate Hospital, ASST di Vimercate, Vimercate, Italy; Research and Study Center of the Italian Society of Angiology and Vascular Pathology (Società Italiana di Angiologia e Patologia Vascolare, SIAPAV), Milan, Italy.
Insights
Comorbidities impact D-dimer
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Geriatrics
- Pulmonary Medicine
Background:
- D-dimer's prognostic accuracy in acute Pulmonary Embolism (APE) may be affected by comorbidities.
- Comorbidity burden (CB) can influence the predictive value of D-dimer for mortality in elderly APE patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how comorbidity burden, assessed by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), affects D-dimer's prognostic ability.
- To evaluate D-dimer's effectiveness in predicting 30 and 90-day mortality in hemodynamically stable, elderly APE patients with varying comorbidity levels.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 162 elderly patients (>65 years) with normotensive APE.
- Comorbidity burden categorized as Low CB (CCI ≤1) and High CB (CCI >1).
- Analysis of D-dimer's prognostic performance using Area Under the Curve (AUC) and Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI), with and without the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI).
Main Results:
- Higher D-dimer levels correlated with increased 30 and 90-day mortality risk in the overall cohort.
- D-dimer significantly improved 30-day mortality prediction in patients with Low CB when added to sPESI (AUC increase, significant NRI).
- D-dimer did not significantly improve mortality prediction in patients with High CB, for both 30 and 90-day outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Comorbidities significantly influence the prognostic performance of D-dimer in elderly patients with normotensive APE.
- D-dimer is a more effective predictor of mortality in elderly APE patients with low comorbidity burden.
- Multimarker strategies incorporating D-dimer and comorbidity assessment are recommended for improved risk stratification in this population.
Introduction:
The prognostic accuracy of D-dimer for risk assessment in acute Pulmonary Embolism (APE) patients may be hampered by comorbidities. We investigated the impact of comorbidity burden (CB) by using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), on the prognostic ability of D-dimer to predict 30 and 90-day mortality in hemodynamically stable elderly patients with APE.
Methods:
All patients aged >65 years with normotensive APE, consecutively evaluated in the Emergency Department since 2010 through 2014 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Area under the curve (AUC) and ½ Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) were calculated.
Results:
Study population: 162 patients, median age: 79.2 years. The optimal cut-off value of CCI score for predicting mortality was ≤1 (Low CB) and >1 (High CB), AUC = 0.786. Higher levels of D-dimer were associated with an increased risk death at 30 (HR = 1.039, 95%CI:1.000-1.080, p = 0.049) and 90 days (HR = 1.039, 95%CI:1.009-1.070, p = 0.012). When added to simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) score, D-dimer increased significantly the AUC for predicting 30-day mortality in Low CB (AUC = 0.778, 95%CI:0.620-0.937, ½NRI = 0.535, p = 0.015), but not in High CB patients (AUC = 0.634, 95%CI:0.460-0.807, ½ NRI = 0.248, p = 0.294). Similarly, for 90-day mortality D-dimer increased significantly the AUC in Low CB (AUC = 0.786, 95%CI:0.643-0.929, ½NRI = 0.424, p-value = 0.025), but not in High CB patients (AUC = 0.659, 95%CI:0.541-0.778, ½NRI = 0.354, p-value = 0.165).
Conclusion:
In elderly patients with normotensive APE, comorbidities condition the prognostic performance of D-dimer, which was found to be a better predictor of death in subjects with low CB. These results support multimarker strategies for risk assessment in this population.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
08:02Establishment of a Minimally Invasive Rat Model of Pulmonary Embolism Using Autologous Blood Clots
Published on: October 25, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis II
Here is a detailed explanation of its pathophysiology:
Transmission: The process begins when a person inhales droplet nuclei containing M. tuberculosis. These are typically released into the air when an individual with pulmonary or...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the...