Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Primary myelofibrosis: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management
1Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Disease Overview:
Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation that is often but not always accompanied by JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutations; additional disease features include bone marrow stromal reaction including reticulin fibrosis, abnormal cytokine expression, anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH), constitutional symptoms, cachexia, leukemic progression, and shortened survival.
Diagnosis:
Diagnosis of PMF is based on bone marrow morphology. Presence of JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutation, expected in ∼ 90% of the patients, is supportive but not essential for diagnosis. The revised 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system distinguishes "prefibrotic" from "overtly fibrotic" PMF; the former might mimic ET in its presentation and it is prognostically relevant to distinguish the two.
Risk Stratification:
Two new prognostic systems for PMF have recently been introduced: GIPSS (genetically inspired prognostic scoring system) and MIPSS70+ version 2.0 (mutation- and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system). GIPSS is based exclusively on mutations and karyotype. MIPSS70+ version 2.0 utilizes both genetic and clinical risk factors. GIPSS features four and MIPSS70+ version 2.0 five risk categories. MIPSS70+ version 2.0 requires an online score calculator (http://www.mipss70score.it) while GIPPS offers a lower complexity prognostic tool.
Risk-Adapted Therapy:
Observation alone is advised for MIPSS70+ version 2.0 "low" and "very low" risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 56%-92%); allogeneic stem cell transplant is the preferred treatment of choice for "very high" and "high" risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 0-13%); treatment-requiring patients with intermediate-risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 30%) are best served by participating in clinical trials. All other treatment approaches, including the use of JAK2 inhibitors, are mostly palliative and should not be used in the absence of clear treatment indications. Conventional treatment for anemia includes androgens, prednisone, thalidomide and danazol, for symptomatic splenomegaly hydroxyurea and ruxolitinib and for constitutional symptoms ruxolitinib. Splenectomy is considered for drug-refractory splenomegaly and involved field radiotherapy for nonhepatosplenic EMH and extremity bone pain.
Insights
Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a rare blood cancer. New risk stratification systems aid in tailoring treatment for PMF patients, improving outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Genetics
Background:
- Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by clonal stem cell proliferation.
- Key features include bone marrow fibrosis, abnormal cytokine expression, anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, and shortened survival.
- JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutations are present in approximately 90% of patients but are not essential for diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and compare two novel prognostic systems for PMF: GIPSS and MIPSS70+ version 2.0.
- To highlight the importance of risk stratification in guiding treatment decisions for PMF patients.
Main Methods:
- Diagnosis relies on bone marrow morphology, with the 2016 WHO classification distinguishing prefibrotic and overtly fibrotic PMF.
- GIPSS (Genetically Inspired Prognostic Scoring System) is based on mutations and karyotype.
- MIPSS70+ version 2.0 (Mutation- and Karyotype-enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System) incorporates both genetic and clinical risk factors.
Main Results:
- GIPSS categorizes patients into four risk levels, while MIPSS70+ version 2.0 has five risk categories.
- MIPSS70+ version 2.0 utilizes an online score calculator, whereas GIPSS offers a simpler tool.
- Risk-adapted therapy recommendations range from observation for low-risk disease to allogeneic stem cell transplant for high-risk disease.
Conclusions:
- Accurate risk stratification using GIPSS and MIPSS70+ version 2.0 is crucial for optimizing PMF management.
- Observation is suitable for low-risk PMF, while high-risk patients benefit from stem cell transplantation.
- Clinical trials are recommended for intermediate-risk PMF patients, and other treatments are primarily palliative.
Related Concept Videos
SI Units: 2019 Redefinition
A standard set of units has been defined...
Relative Risk
Nursing Diagnosis
The nursing diagnosis focuses on evidence-based...
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I
There are thirteen domains...
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...

