Criminalization of HIV non-disclosure: Narratives from young men living in Vancouver, Canada
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Visualizing Cell-to-cell Transfer of HIV using Fluorescent Clones of HIV and Live Confocal Microscopy
Published on: October 7, 2010
Rod Knight1,2, Andrea Krüsi3,4, Anna Carson3
1British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, Canada.
Background:
Previous research has identified the impacts of legal frameworks that criminalize HIV non-disclosure among people living with HIV (e.g., elevated stigma and violence). However, far less is known about the perspectives or experiences of people-particularly, men-who are HIV-seronegative or who are unaware of their status. The objective of this paper is to describe the health and social risks that young men perceive to be associated with an HIV diagnosis in the context of Canada's current legal framework pertaining to HIV non-disclosure.
Methods:
We analyzed data from 100 in-depth interviews (2013-2016) conducted with 85 young men ages 18-30 in Vancouver on the topic of the criminalization of HIV non-disclosure.
Results:
Our analysis revealed two dominant narratives in relation to HIV criminalization: (a) interrogation and (b) justification. An interrogation narrative problematized the moral permissibility of criminalizing HIV non-disclosure. In this narrative, Canada's HIV non-disclosure legal framework was characterized as creating unjust barriers to HIV testing uptake, as well as impeding access to and reducing retention in care for those living with HIV. Conversely, a justification narrative featured a surprising number of references to HIV as a "death sentence", despite effective treatments being universally available in Canada. However, most of those who presented the justification narrative asserted that the criminalization of HIV non-disclosure was morally justified in light of the perceived negative stigma-related impacts of HIV (e.g., discrimination; being ostracized from sex or romantic partners, friends, family). The justification narrative often reflected a belief that the legal framework provides both punishment and deterrence, which were perceived to supersede any barriers to care for both HIV-positive and -negative individuals.
Conclusion:
Public education regarding contemporary medical advances in HIV may help contest lay understandings of HIV as a "death sentence", which is particularly relevant to destabilizing justification narratives. However, significant strengthening of HIV stigma-reduction efforts will be needed to move society away from narratives that attempt to justify Canada's current HIV non-disclosure legal framework.
Related Concept Videos
Protein Dynamics in Living Cells
Fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a fluorescent-protein-based detection technique used to quantify protein movement rates within the cell. This method exposes a small portion of the cell to an intense laser beam. The laser beam causes permanent photobleaching of the fluorophore-tagged proteins in the exposed region. As the bleached...
Relationship Formation
Sternberg's Triangular Theory of Love
Viral Mutations
Hindsight Biases
Self-Schemas

