Fluorescence photobleaching of microplastics: A cautionary tale
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Accumulation and Distribution of Fluorescent Microplastics in the Early Life Stages of Zebrafish
Published on: July 4, 2021
Kelley D Sullivan1, Valerie Gugliada1
1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.
Abstract:
Fluorescence microscopy is an important step in visual identification of microplastics and is used to highlight white and transparent plastics that are otherwise easily missed or misidentified. Investigators using fluorescence must proceed with caution, however, as fluorescence photobleaching can significantly reduce the fluorescence output of samples within experimentally relevant time frames. We report on the photobleaching rate and subsequent lack of fluorescence recovery of five common plastics. Our results reveal statistically different photobleaching rates across plastic types. In the best-case scenario of low illumination intensity and a robust plastic, initial fluorescence intensity decayed by 10% in just 11(3) s and by 33% in 230(40) s. In all cases, fluorescence failed to recover more than 13(8)% in 3 h. These results indicate that significant bleaching can occur while searching a sample for plastics to identify and that the lack of recovery can compromise samples for further study.
Insights
Fluorescence microscopy for microplastic identification is hampered by photobleaching, which rapidly reduces sample fluorescence. Recovering fluorescence after bleaching is minimal, impacting further analysis.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Analytical Chemistry
- Materials Science
Background:
- Fluorescence microscopy is crucial for identifying microplastics, especially transparent and white types.
- Photobleaching, the loss of fluorescence under illumination, poses a significant challenge in microplastic analysis.
- Rapid photobleaching can reduce fluorescence intensity within experimental timeframes, affecting detection and quantification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the photobleaching rates of five common plastics under fluorescence microscopy.
- To assess the potential for fluorescence recovery in these plastics after photobleaching.
- To inform researchers about the limitations and potential compromises when using fluorescence microscopy for microplastic identification.
Main Methods:
- Investigated photobleaching rates and fluorescence recovery of five common plastic types.
- Utilized fluorescence microscopy with controlled illumination intensity.
- Measured fluorescence intensity decay over time and assessed recovery after a 3-hour period.
Main Results:
- Statistically significant differences in photobleaching rates were observed among the plastic types.
- In optimal conditions, fluorescence intensity decayed by 10% in 11 seconds and 33% in 230 seconds.
- Fluorescence recovery was minimal, with a maximum of 13% observed after 3 hours.
Conclusions:
- Photobleaching significantly diminishes fluorescence in microplastics during microscopy, even under low illumination.
- The lack of substantial fluorescence recovery compromises the integrity of samples for subsequent analyses.
- Researchers must exercise caution and consider photobleaching effects when planning and executing microplastic studies using fluorescence microscopy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Photoluminescence: Fluorescence and Phosphorescence
A pair of electrons in a...
Atomic Fluorescence Spectroscopy
Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy
Variables Affecting Phosphorescence and Fluorescence
Fluorescence and Phosphorescence: Instrumentation
Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy

