Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

322
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
322
Toxic Reactions: Overview01:26

Toxic Reactions: Overview

2.1K
When toxic substances penetrate the human body, they disseminate to various tissues, undergoing metabolic changes. This process yields reactive metabolites that may covalently bind with specific target molecules, resulting in toxicity.
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...
2.1K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.8K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.8K
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

4.4K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.4K
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias01:30

Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias

383
Dysrhythmias, also known as arrhythmias, are disturbances in the heart's rhythm that range from benign to life-threatening. A thorough evaluation is crucial for appropriate management and involves a comprehensive medical history, physical examination, and various diagnostic tests.Medical HistorySymptoms: Collect detailed information on palpitations, dizziness, syncope, chest pain, and fatigue. Note their onset, frequency, and triggers.Previous Cardiac Issues: Document any history of heart...
383
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation01:30

Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation

199
Self-evaluation is the process by which individuals assess their abilities, behaviors, and characteristics based on feedback from others. Charles H. Cooley observed that a person’s self-perception is primarily influenced by how others see and judge them. He suggested that individuals form their identities based on their interpretations of others' reactions. As a result, social interactions play a crucial role in shaping self-esteem and personal identity. These external evaluations often...
199

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cytokine inducible SH2-containing protein: a versatile negative regulator of cytokine receptor signaling.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

The Interleukin-7 Receptor Signaling Pathway and Its Perturbation in Immunodeficiency, Autoimmune Disease and Lymphoid Malignancy.

Biomolecules·2026
Same author

Light-Driven Intraoctahedral Halide Isomerization in Two-Dimensional Mixed Halide Perovskites.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Colony-Stimulating Factor 3 Receptor Mutations and Variants in Hematological Malignancies.

Cancers·2025
Same author

Ultrathin Multi-Doped Molybdenum Oxide Nanodots as a Tunable Selective Biocatalyst.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Utilization Patterns and Costs of Ocular Amniotic Membrane Grafts in the Medicare Population.

Ophthalmology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Rapid Evaluation of Toxicity of Chemical Compounds Using Zebrafish Embryos
07:49

Rapid Evaluation of Toxicity of Chemical Compounds Using Zebrafish Embryos

Published on: August 25, 2019

11.6K

Zebrafish as a Model to Evaluate Nanoparticle Toxicity.

Enamul Haque1,2, Alister C Ward3,4

  • 1School of Medicine, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216, Australia. md.haque@deakin.edu.au.

Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 26, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Zebrafish models effectively assess nanoparticle toxicity for clinical and environmental safety. This review details how zebrafish evaluate nanoparticle biocompatibility and potential health risks.

Keywords:
biocompatibilitynanoparticlesnanotoxicityzebrafish

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: High-Throughput Toxicity Screening Using Zebrafish Embryo Startle Response Assay
06:25

Author Spotlight: High-Throughput Toxicity Screening Using Zebrafish Embryo Startle Response Assay

Published on: January 12, 2024

2.2K
Kupffer Cell Isolation for Nanoparticle Toxicity Testing
09:49

Kupffer Cell Isolation for Nanoparticle Toxicity Testing

Published on: August 18, 2015

24.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Rapid Evaluation of Toxicity of Chemical Compounds Using Zebrafish Embryos
07:49

Rapid Evaluation of Toxicity of Chemical Compounds Using Zebrafish Embryos

Published on: August 25, 2019

11.6K
Author Spotlight: High-Throughput Toxicity Screening Using Zebrafish Embryo Startle Response Assay
06:25

Author Spotlight: High-Throughput Toxicity Screening Using Zebrafish Embryo Startle Response Assay

Published on: January 12, 2024

2.2K
Kupffer Cell Isolation for Nanoparticle Toxicity Testing
09:49

Kupffer Cell Isolation for Nanoparticle Toxicity Testing

Published on: August 18, 2015

24.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Environmental Toxicology
  • Nanotechnology

Background:

  • Nanoparticles offer significant potential in medicine (drug delivery, diagnostics) and industry, but their environmental exposure necessitates safety assessments.
  • Understanding nanoparticle interactions with biological systems is crucial for evaluating both clinical safety and environmental impact.
  • Zebrafish are emerging as a valuable model organism for comprehensive nanoparticle biocompatibility and toxicity studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the utility of zebrafish as a model for assessing nanoparticle toxicity.
  • To outline the various levels at which zebrafish can be used to evaluate nanoparticle effects.
  • To provide an overview of existing studies on metal, metal oxide, and carbon-based nanoparticle toxicity in zebrafish.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing zebrafish to assess nanoparticle toxicity across multiple endpoints.
  • Evaluating mortality, teratogenicity, immunotoxicity, and genotoxicity.
  • Monitoring physiological readouts including reproduction and behavior.

Main Results:

  • Zebrafish models allow for multi-level assessment of nanoparticle toxicity.
  • Studies have demonstrated the utility of zebrafish in evaluating various nanoparticle types (metal, metal oxide, carbon-based).
  • Diverse toxicological endpoints can be effectively measured in zebrafish exposed to nanoparticles.

Conclusions:

  • Zebrafish provide a robust and versatile model for in vivo nanoparticle safety evaluation.
  • This model aids in understanding nanoparticle interactions and potential health implications.
  • Findings inform the development of safer, biocompatible nanoparticles for diverse applications.