The midterm results of coronary endarterectomy in patients with diffuse coronary artery disease
Zhibing Qiu1, L Auchoybur Merveesh1, Yueyue Xu1
1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Changle Rd 68, Nanjing, 210006, Jiangsu, China.
Insights
Coronary endarterectomy (CE) combined with CABG offers a safe revascularization option for diffuse coronary artery disease. Early and mid-term results show good graft patency, especially when CE is performed on the LAD with LIMA grafting.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Diffuse coronary artery disease presents challenges for traditional revascularization methods like PCI and CABG.
- Coronary artery endarterectomy (CE) combined with CABG is explored as an alternative for complete revascularization.
- Mid- and long-term outcomes of CE have been a subject of debate.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the early and mid-term graft patency of concomitant coronary artery endarterectomy and CABG.
- To assess the safety and feasibility of CE in patients with diffuse coronary artery disease.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 304 patients undergoing CE and CABG for diffuse coronary artery disease.
- Inclusion criteria: complete records, good intraoperative graft flow, discharge, and 1- or 3-year follow-up.
- Follow-up data collected via outpatient visits and telephone contact; statistical analysis using Chi-square and student's t-tests.
Main Results:
- The study included 238 patients (269 target vessels), with a mean age of 67.8 years.
- Overall graft patency was 78.4% at 1 year and 69.8% at 3 years.
- Left coronary graft patency was higher than right; no significant difference between on-pump and off-pump CE+CABG. Predictors of better patency included LIMA graft, CE on LAD, and intra-operative graft flow parameters.
Conclusions:
- Coronary endarterectomy (CE) is a safe and feasible option for select patients with diffuse coronary artery disease, demonstrating excellent mid-term survival and graft patency.
- CE yields superior results when performed on the Left Anterior Descending (LAD) artery and grafted with the Left Internal Mammary Artery (LIMA).
- Both on-pump and off-pump surgical approaches yield similar outcomes, positioning CE as a viable alternative for coronary artery reconstruction.
Background:
Diffuse coronary artery disease is a challenge for both percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Coronary artery endarterectomy (CE) coupled with CABG is an alternative method to achieve complete revascularization. The mid- and long-term results of CE are largely questionable. The aim is to evaluate the early and mid-term graft patency of concomitant coronary artery endarterectomy and CABG.
Methods:
A total of 304 patients who had undergone concomitant CE and CABG for diffuse coronary artery disease were identified from our database. A total of 238 patients (1) with complete operative records, (2) with good graft flow during surgery, (3) who were discharged, (4) with a one-year/ three-year follow-up were included in our study. The follow-up information was obtained directly from our out-patient department and by telephone contact. The categorical and continuous values were analyzed by Chi Square test and student's test respectively.
Results:
CE was performed on 238 patients who represented a total of 269 target coronary vessels. The mean age of the patients was 67.8 ± 6.8 years old; male to female patient ratio was 170:68. The mean intensive care unit stay was 1.7 ± 8 days, and mean post-operative length of hospital stay was 11 ± 3 days. The average follow up time was 41.8 ± 21.4 months. At follow-up, the overall graft patency was 78.4% at one year and 69.8% at three years. The left coronary graft patency rate was significantly higher than the right coronary graft patency rate (87.4% vs 73.1% at one-year and 78.2% vs 64.8% at three years). There was no significant difference in graft patency rates between the on-pump CE + CABG vs off-pump CE + CABG groups at one year (80.0% vs 76.9%) and at three years (92.3% vs 91.7%). At the one-year follow up, 92.3% of grafts showed grade A patency in the on-pump group versus 91.7% in the off-pump group; 7.7% of grafts showed grade B patency in the on-pump group versus 8.3% in the off-pump group. At the three-year follow up, 80.6% of grafts showed grade A patency in the on-pump group versus 77.4% in the off-pump group; 19.4% of grafts showed grade B patency in the on-pump group versus 22.6% in the off -pump group. The Predictors of better graft patency are use of LIMA graft, CE on LAD, and intra-operative graft flow meter and PI.
Conclusions:
In patients with diffuse coronary disease, CE is a safe and feasible technique for a select group of patients with excellent mid-term survival rates and graft patency rates. CE produces better overall results when performed on the LAD, and grafted over with the LIMA. Similar outcomes are obtained with both on-pump and off-pump surgery. For a select group of patients, coronary endarterectomy (CE) offers an alternative choice of coronary artery reconstruction and complete coronary revascularization.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Coronary Circulation
Coronary circulation begins at the base of the aorta, where two main arteries arise—the left and right coronary arteries. These arteries encircle the heart in the coronary sulcus and supply the...


