Computing integrated information
Stephan Krohn1, Dirk Ostwald1,2
1Computational Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, Berlin 14195, Germany.
Abstract:
Integrated information theory (IIT) has established itself as one of the leading theories for the study of consciousness. IIT essentially proposes that quantitative consciousness is identical to maximally integrated conceptual information, quantified by a measure called Φmax, and that phenomenological experience corresponds to the associated set of maximally irreducible cause-effect repertoires of a physical system being in a certain state. With the current work, we provide a general formulation of the framework, which comprehensively and parsimoniously expresses Φmax in the language of probabilistic models. Here, the stochastic process describing a system under scrutiny corresponds to a first-order time-invariant Markov process, and all necessary mathematical operations for the definition of Φmax are fully specified by a system's joint probability distribution over two adjacent points in discrete time. We present a detailed constructive rule for the decomposition of a system into two disjoint subsystems based on flexible marginalization and factorization of this joint distribution. Furthermore, we show that for a given joint distribution, virtualization is identical to a flexible factorization enforcing independence between variable subsets. We then validate our formulation in a previously established discrete example system, in which we also illustrate the previously unexplored theoretical issue of quale underdetermination due to non-unique maximally irreducible cause-effect repertoires. Moreover, we show that the current definition of Φ entails its sensitivity to the shape of the conceptual structure in qualia space, thus tying together IIT's measures of quantitative and qualitative consciousness, which we suggest be better disentangled. We propose several modifications of the framework in order to address some of these issues.
More Related Videos
05:49Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
Published on: February 23, 2024
05:25Author Spotlight: Quantifying Rough Eye Phenotypes in Drosophila Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis with Frontotemporal Dementia
Published on: October 4, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Integration by Parts: Indefinite Integrals
Integration by Parts: Definite Integrals
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Design Example: Traverse Angle Computations
Integrator and Differentiator
An integrator within an op-amp circuit produces an output directly proportional to the integral of the input signal. This is achieved by replacing the feedback resistor in a typical inverting...
Definite Integral
