Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

In situ Subcellular Fractionation of Adherent and Non-adherent Mammalian Cells
Published on: July 23, 2010
Craniopharyngioma adherence: a reappraisal of the evidence
Ruth Prieto1, José María Pascual2, Verena Hofecker3
1Department of Neurosurgery, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Manuel de Falla 1, Majadahonda, 28222, Madrid, Spain. rprieto29@hotmail.com.
Abstract:
Craniopharyngioma (CP) adherence represents a most baffling problem for the neurosurgeon. The highest priority of current surgical treatment is to maximize tumor removal without compromising the patients' long-term functional outcome. Surgical damage to the hypothalamus may be avoided or at least ameliorated with a precise knowledge regarding the type of adherence for each case. This article presents a comprehensive review of the pathological, surgical, and radiological sources of evidence supporting that CP adherence, despite being heterogenous, is characterized by repeating patterns. The key underlying factors of CP adherence are also discussed. Three components define the type of adherence for each case: (i) the intracranial structures attached to the tumor, (ii) the adherence morphology, and (iii) the adhesion strength. Combination of these three components gives rise to five hierarchical levels of increased risk of hypothalamic injury during tumor removal. Tumor topography has been identified as the major predictor of the type of CP adherence. The most extensive and strongest adhesions to the hypothalamus occur in CPs originated in the suprasellar cistern that secondarily invade the third ventricle (secondary intraventricular CPs) and in those originated within the third ventricle floor itself (not-strictly intraventricular CPs). Three findings observed on preoperative conventional MRI scans have proven to be reliable predictors of adherence severity. A position of the hypothalamus around the middle portion of the tumor, an amputated pituitary stalk, and an elliptical tumor shape points to the severe and critical risk levels, and in those cases, a safer limited removal is strongly recommended.
Related Concept Videos
The Evidence for Evolution
Nature and Nurture
Confirmation Biases
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Routes of Persuasion
What is Evolutionary History?

