Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression
Published on: May 19, 2015
Design and rationale for the DIVERSITY study: An open-label, randomized study of dabigatran etexilate for pediatric
Manuela Albisetti1, Branislav Biss2, Lisa Bomgaars3
1Hematology Department University Children's Hospital Zürich Switzerland.
Insights
This study will evaluate dabigatran etexilate (DE) as a new treatment for pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE). The trial compares DE to the standard of care to assess its safety and effectiveness in children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Hematology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Current pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatments, including unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), have limitations.
- Dabigatran etexilate (DE) shows promise for VTE treatment, with established efficacy and safety in adults.
- Pediatric-specific trials are necessary to determine appropriate dosing and confirm efficacy for DE in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline the design of a phase IIb/III trial for pediatric VTE.
- To evaluate a proposed dosing algorithm for dabigatran etexilate (DE) in children.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of DE compared to the standard of care (SOC) for pediatric VTE.
Main Methods:
- An open-label, randomized, noninferiority study involving approximately 180 pediatric patients (0 to <18 years) with VTE.
- Patients will receive either DE or SOC for 3 months, following initial UFH or LMWH treatment.
- DE will be administered twice daily in age-appropriate formulations (capsules, pellets, or liquid) based on a proposed dosing algorithm.
Main Results:
- The study will determine the efficacy of DE by assessing complete thrombus resolution, freedom from recurrent VTE, and VTE-related mortality.
- The safety of DE will be evaluated by measuring freedom from major bleeding events.
- Two co-primary endpoints will be used to assess both efficacy and safety.
Conclusions:
- The trial findings are expected to provide crucial data on the effectiveness and safety of dabigatran etexilate (DE) for treating pediatric VTE.
- This research aims to establish DE as a viable alternative to current treatments for VTE in children.
- The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01895777).
Background:
The current standard of care (SOC) for pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE) comprises unfractionated heparin (UFH), or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) followed by LMWH or vitamin K antagonists, all of which have limitations. Dabigatran etexilate (DE) has demonstrated efficacy and safety for adult VTE and has the potential to overcome some of the limitations of the current SOC. Pediatric trials are needed to establish dosing in children and to confirm that results obtained in adults are applicable in the pediatric setting.
Objectives:
To describe the design and rationale of a planned phase IIb/III trial that will evaluate a proposed dosing algorithm for DE and assess the safety and efficacy of DE versus SOC for pediatric VTE treatment.
Patients/Methods:
An open-label, randomized, parallel-group noninferiority study will be conducted in approximately 180 patients aged 0 to <18 years with VTE, who have received initial UFH or LMWH treatment and who are expected to require ≥3 months of anticoagulation therapy. Patients will receive DE or SOC for 3 months. DE will be administered twice daily as capsules, pellets, or an oral liquid formulation according to patient age. Initial doses will be calculated using a proposed dosing algorithm.
Results:
There will be two coprimary endpoints: a composite efficacy endpoint comprising the proportion of patients with complete thrombus resolution, freedom from recurrent VTE and VTE-related mortality, and a safety endpoint: freedom from major bleeding events.
Conclusion:
Findings will provide valuable information regarding the efficacy and safety of DE for the treatment of pediatric VTE. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01895777.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability

