Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cancer Associated Thrombosis Research in Rodent Models
Published on: January 5, 2024
Electronic alerts, comparative practitioner metrics, and education improve thromboprophylaxis and reduce venous
Scott C Woller1,2, Scott M Stevens1,2, R Scott Evans3,4
1Department of Medicine Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.
Background:
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis remains underutilized in hospitalized medical patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism. We previously reported that a multifaceted intervention was associated with a sustained increase in appropriate thromboprophylaxis and reduced symptomatic venous thromboembolism among medical patients hospitalized in two urban teaching hospitals. The effectiveness of this intervention in community hospitals is unknown.
Methods:
We performed a prospective multicenter cohort study in three community hospitals. All medical patients admitted from February 1, 2011 to January 31, 2014 were eligible. Consecutive eligible patients were enrolled into the 12-month "control," 12-month "intervention," or 12-month "maintenance" group. We provided electronic alerts, physician performance feedback, and targeted medical education for the intervention group. Only the alert component of the intervention continued in the maintenance group. The primary outcome was the rate of appropriate thromboprophylaxis among patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism defined as the prescription of guideline recommended chemoprophylaxis, or identification of a chemoprophylaxis contraindication. Secondary outcomes included rates of symptomatic venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, all-cause mortality, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, physician satisfaction, and alert fatigue.
Results:
Appropriate thromboprophylaxis when compared to the control group rate of 67% was higher for the intervention group (85%) and for the maintenance group (77%; P < .001 for each comparison). A reduction of 90-day symptomatic venous thromboembolism accompanied the intervention (control 4.5%, intervention 3.4%, maintenance 3.0%, P = .04).
Conclusions:
This multifaceted intervention was associated with an overall increase in appropriate thromboprophylaxis of medical patients compared with the control period. Hospital-associated venous thrombosis rates decreased.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
Hospitals-I

