Impact of confrontations by therapists on impairment and utilization of the therapeutic alliance

Striking the balance between creating challenge through confrontation (drawing attention to discrepancies) to encourage change and offering support through the therapeutic relationship to ensure safety for patients represents a central issue for psychotherapists. The aim of the present study was to assess immediate effects of confrontations by therapists on the therapeutic alliance.

We rated video recordings of 77 therapies to measure incidences of alliance ruptures/resolution attempts as well as confrontations by therapists. Change in the therapeutic alliance and therapy outcome were measured through questionnaires filled out by patients.

Confrontations were significantly associated with ruptures/resolution attempts on the micro level. Changes in the therapeutic alliance moderated the association between confrontations and alliance ruptures on the macro level: The bigger the fraction of a session containing confrontations, the larger the fraction containing ruptures, given a prior positive change in the therapeutic alliance. Therapists' use of confrontation during a resolution attempt was associated with significantly better therapy outcomes than no use of confrontation during or no resolution attempt.

Confrontations by therapists may temporarily impair the therapeutic alliance, but might also lead to better therapy outcomes when used to make an alliance rupture explicit as part of a resolution attempt. Clinical or methodological significance: This study provides quantitative explorations of therapists' fears and hopes regarding the use of confrontations (defined as focus on a discrepancy by the therapist). Results point to associations between confrontations and alliance ruptures, especially in the context of a secure alliance. Furthermore, resolution attempts might profit from initial confrontations regarding the relevant alliance rupture.