Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Clear Resin Casting of Arthropods for Use in Education, Outreach, and Research
Published on: January 16, 2026
Editorial Processes in Free Open Access Medical Educational (FOAM) Resources
Arden Azim1, Jennifer Beck-Esmay2, Teresa M Chan3
1Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.
Editorial processes exist in online educational resources (OERs) for emergency medicine (EM), despite a lack of transparency. Disclosure of these processes is reliably assessed, supporting their use in critical appraisal tools for OERs.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Digital Health
- Information Science
Background:
- Skepticism towards online educational resources (OERs) in emergency medicine (EM) arises from low publishing barriers and perceived lack of rigor.
- Learners and educators struggle with consistent appraisal of OERs, highlighting a need for better evaluation tools.
- Disclosure of editorial process is a key quality indicator for OERs, yet its prevalence and integration into appraisal tools for online EM resources remain understudied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the presence and description of editorial processes in top online emergency medicine and critical care resources.
- To evaluate the inter-rater reliability of assessing the mention and description of editorial processes.
- To determine if academic affiliation influences the disclosure of editorial processes in OERs.
Main Methods:
- Two reviewers assessed 100 top EM and critical care OERs for editorial process disclosure and affiliations.
- Sites were contacted for clarification regarding their editorial processes.
- Inter-rater reliability was measured using Cohen's kappa; the association between academic affiliation and editorial process disclosure was analyzed using odds ratios.
Main Results:
- Only 11 out of 92 accessible OERs mentioned an editorial process, with 10 providing a description.
- Inter-rater agreement for identifying and describing editorial processes was excellent (κ=0.90 for mention, κ=1.00 for description).
- OERs with academic affiliations were more likely to disclose their editorial process (OR=5.3) compared to those without.
Conclusions:
- Editorial processes are present in online emergency medicine resources, though transparency is often limited.
- The reliable assessment of editorial process disclosure supports its inclusion in critical appraisal tools for OERs.
- Academic affiliation is associated with a higher likelihood of disclosing editorial processes, suggesting a potential quality marker.
Related Concept Videos
Short-distance Transport of Resources
Inhaled Medications
Types of Records II: Educational and Administrative Records
Xylem and Transpiration-driven Transport of Resources
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Myocarditis III: Medical Management

