Bayesian inference of hub nodes across multiple networks.
Junghi Kim1, Kim-Anh Do1, Min Jin Ha1
1Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Biometrics
|July 28, 2018
Summary
This study introduces a novel Bayesian method for analyzing multiple biological networks by focusing on shared hub nodes. This approach enhances the identification of key regulatory elements and potential therapeutic targets across different conditions.
Area of Science:
- Systems Biology
- Network Biology
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Hub nodes are critical in biological networks, influencing phenotypes and disease outcomes.
- Understanding network similarities and differences across conditions is essential for biological insights.
- Existing methods often focus on edge sharing, potentially overlooking conserved hub structures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a Bayesian approach for joint inference of multiple biological networks.
- To identify shared and differential hub nodes across networks, rather than focusing solely on edge sharing.
- To provide a more intuitive interpretation of network structures and guide therapeutic target identification.
Main Methods:
- Formulation of a Bayesian statistical framework for multiple network inference.
- Direct inference of shared and differential hub nodes across different network settings.
- Comparison with existing methods using simulations and analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) ovarian carcinoma dataset.
Main Results:
- The proposed method effectively identifies common and distinct hub nodes across multiple networks.
- It improves the power to detect edges connected to highly influential nodes.
- Demonstrated utility in inferring co-expression networks from real-world cancer data.
Conclusions:
- Focusing on conserved hub nodes offers a powerful alternative for multiple network analysis.
- The Bayesian approach provides interpretable results and aids in identifying potential therapeutic targets.
- This method enhances biological network inference by leveraging cross-network hub information.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
02:26Protein Networks
4.6K
An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
4.6K
02:26Protein Networks
2.9K
2.9K
02:18Network Covalent Solids
16.2K
Network covalent solids contain a three-dimensional network of covalently bonded atoms as found in the crystal structures of nonmetals like diamond, graphite, silicon, and some covalent compounds, such as silicon dioxide (sand) and silicon carbide (carborundum, the abrasive on sandpaper). Many minerals have networks of covalent bonds.
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
16.2K
01:15Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
588
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
588
01:49Multiple Allele Traits
38.2K
The Concept of Multiple Allelism
38.2K
01:16Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data
490
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
490