Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions
Published on: March 22, 2018
Prospective study of biomechanical risk factors for second and third metatarsal stress fractures in military recruits
Sharon Dixon1, Michael Nunns1, Carol House2
1Sport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, UK.
Objectives:
This prospective study investigated anatomical and biomechanical risk factors for second and third metatarsal stress fractures in military recruits during training.
Design:
Prospective cohort study.
Methods:
Anatomical and biomechanical measures were taken for 1065 Royal Marines recruits at the start of training when injury-free. Data included passive range of ankle dorsi-flexion, dynamic peak ankle dorsi-flexion and plantar pressures during barefoot running. Separate univariate regression models were developed to identify differences between recruits who developed second (n=7) or third (n=14) metatarsal stress fracture and a cohort of recruits completing training with no injury (n=150) (p<0.05). A multinomial logistic regression model was developed to predict the risk of injury for the two sites compared with the no-injury group. Multinomial logistic regression results were back transformed from log scale and presented in Relative Risk Ratios (RRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results:
Lower dynamic arch index (high arch) (RRR: 0.75, CI: 0.63-0.89, p<0.01) and lower foot abduction (RRR: 0.87, CI: 0.80-0.96, p<0.01) were identified as increasing risk for second metatarsal stress fracture, while younger age (RRR: 0.78, CI: 0.61-0.99, p<0.05) and later peak pressure at the second metatarsal head area (RRR: 1.19, CI: 1.04-1.35, p<0.01) were identified as risk factors for third metatarsal stress fracture.
Conclusions:
For second metatarsal stress fracture, aspects of foot type have been identified as influencing injury risk. For third metatarsal stress fracture, a delayed forefoot loading increases injury risk. Identification of these different injury mechanisms can inform development of interventions for treatment and prevention.
More Related Videos
11:38A Flow Adhesion Assay to Study Leucocyte Recruitment to Human Hepatic Sinusoidal Endothelium Under Conditions of Shear Stress
Published on: March 21, 2014
10:11Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies
Published on: October 22, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Transcription Factors
Transcription Elongation Factors
The transcription elongation is regulated via pausing of RNA polymerase on several occasions during transcription. In bacteria, these halts are necessary because the transcription of DNA into mRNA is coupled to the translation of that mRNA...
Relative Risk
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Responses to Salt Stress