Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Electroencephalography Network Indices as Biomarkers of Upper Limb Impairment in Chronic Stroke
Published on: July 14, 2023
Appropriateness of Indications of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and its Association With Positive Finding
Tanka Prasad Bohara1, Uttam Laudari1, Abhishek Thapa1
1Department of Surgery, Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital, Sinamangal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Introduction:
Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a frequently advised investigation for upper abdominal symptoms. Studies have questioned the appropriateness of indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and have shown that inappropriate indications range from 5% to 49%. The unnecessary upper gastrointestinal endoscopy expose patients to the risk. The number of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is rising in our region and we assume so is the number of unnecessary upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. With an aim to find out the appropriateness of the indications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and compare its association with positive findings, we conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study.
Methods:
All patients undergoing diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy during study period were included in the study. Appropriateness of indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was defined as per American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy criteria as "appropriate" and "inappropriate". Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings were classified as "significant" and "insignificant" based on endoscopy findings. The extent of this association between appropriateness of indications and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings was expressed as the odds ratio of finding a relevant diagnosis in patients with an ''appropriate'' indication compared with those with an 'inappropriate'' indication.
Results:
Seventy-nine patients were included in the study. Fifty- two (65.8%) of the indications were considered appropriate as per American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines. Thirty-three (63.5%) of the appropriate indications has clinically significant finding as compared to seven (25.9%) of inappropriate indication with an odds ratio of 4.962 (95% CI:1.773 - 13.890, P=0.002) which is statistically significant.
Conclusions:
Appropriate indications have significantly higher rates of clinically significant findings. Use of guidelines may decrease the number of unnecessary procedures.
Related Concept Videos
Indicators
Position-effect Variegation
Anatomy of the Gastrointestinal System
Here's a detailed walkthrough of this complex system:
Finding the Center of Gravity
Association Areas of the Cortex
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...

