Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression
Published on: May 19, 2015
A Qualitative, Systems Thinking Approach to Study Self-Management in Women With Migraine
Deanna R Befus1, Kristen Hassmiller Lich, Shawn M Kneipp
1Deanna R. Befus, PhD, RN, is Research Fellow, Center for Integrative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Kristen Hassmiller Lich, PhD, is Associate Professor, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. Shawn M. Kneipp, PhD, RN, FAANP, is Associate Professor, School of Nursing, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. Janet P. Bettger, ScD, is Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. Remy R. Coeytaux, MD, PhD, is Professor, Center for Integrative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Janice C. Humphreys, PhD, RN, FAAN, is Professor, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina.
Migraine self-management for women requires adaptable tools. A strengths-based approach improved support for marginalized individuals, addressing complex health behaviors and systemic inequities.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Public Health
- Sociology
Background:
- Migraine is a debilitating neurobiological condition with limited treatment options.
- Nonpharmacological self-management is essential for women living with migraine.
- Migraine disproportionately affects and disables women, particularly those in vulnerable social locations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and apply a systems thinking, problem-structuring data collection approach for studying migraine self-management.
- To explore the self-management experiences of women with migraine in diverse social contexts.
Main Methods:
- Developed two systems mapping activities: a system support map for migraine episodes and a connection circle (CC) for self-management mental models.
- Utilized constant comparison analysis, theory, clinical experience, and participant feedback to refine the approach.
- Replaced the CC with a strengths-based problem-solving tool to better support participants.
Main Results:
- The initial connection circle (CC) approach overwhelmed marginalized women.
- A recalibrated, strengths-based problem-solving activity proved more effective and actionable for diverse participants.
- The revised approach highlighted relationships and trade-offs in self-management.
Conclusions:
- A critical, strengths-based approach can replace deficit thinking in healthcare for vulnerable populations.
- Systems thinking tools can illuminate complex self-management behaviors and challenges faced by women with migraine.
- Healthcare models must consider social and structural determinants of health and equity for effective migraine management.
Related Concept Videos
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Qualitative Analysis
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
Counterfactual Thinking
Critical Thinking I
Critical Thinking II
Critical Thinking
Colleges and universities are...

