Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Phase-lead and Phase-lag Controllers01:22

Phase-lead and Phase-lag Controllers

574
Understanding the working function of different types of controllers can be illustrated with practical analogies, such as adjusting a stereo's volume equalizer. Cranking up the bass involves a phase-lead controller, which functions as a high-pass filter, while increasing the treble uses a phase-lag controller, which acts as a low-pass filter. PD controllers, similar to high-pass filters, enhance the system's response to high-frequency components. PI controllers, akin to low-pass...
574
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

3.2K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.2K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.5K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.5K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.5K
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lead Control01:24

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lead Control

477
Phase-lead controllers are commonly used in various control systems to enhance response speed and stability. Adjusting the brightness on a television screen offers a practical example of phase-lead control. When contrast is enhanced, a phase-lead controller is employed. Mathematically, phase-lead control is identified when the first parameter is smaller than the second.
The design of phase-lead control involves the strategic placement of poles and zeros to balance steady-state error and system...
477
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control01:21

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control

422
Phase-lag controllers are widely used in control systems to improve stability and reduce steady-state errors. A dimmer switch controlling the brightness of a light bulb serves as a practical example of phase-lag control, gradually adjusting the bulb's brightness. Mathematically, phase-lag control or low-pass filtering is represented when the factor 'a' is less than 1.
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any...
422

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distortions to the penetration depth and coherence length of superconductor/normal-metal superlattices.

Physical review materials·2026
Same author

Probing Sensitivity Near a Quantum Exceptional Point Using Waveguide Quantum Electrodynamics.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Synchronous detection of cosmic rays and correlated errors in superconducting qubit arrays.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Near-ultrastrong nonlinear light-matter coupling in superconducting circuits.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Upper critical fields in normal metal-superconductor-normal metal trilayers.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Superfluid stiffness of magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene.

Nature·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Colonization of Euprymna scolopes Squid by Vibrio fischeri
08:58

Colonization of Euprymna scolopes Squid by Vibrio fischeri

Published on: March 1, 2012

20.5K

Phase control in a spin-triplet SQUID.

Joseph A Glick1, Victor Aguilar1, Adel B Gougam1,2

  • 1Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

Science Advances
|August 1, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers demonstrated a controllable phase shift in Josephson junctions with three magnetic layers. This breakthrough in spin-triplet supercurrents could enable memory elements for superconducting computers.

More Related Videos

Scanning SQUID Study of Vortex Manipulation by Local Contact
06:53

Scanning SQUID Study of Vortex Manipulation by Local Contact

Published on: February 1, 2017

7.3K
Obtaining Hemocytes from the Hawaiian Bobtail Squid Euprymna scolopes and Observing their Adherence to Symbiotic and Non-Symbiotic Bacteria
05:29

Obtaining Hemocytes from the Hawaiian Bobtail Squid Euprymna scolopes and Observing their Adherence to Symbiotic and Non-Symbiotic Bacteria

Published on: February 11, 2010

13.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Colonization of Euprymna scolopes Squid by Vibrio fischeri
08:58

Colonization of Euprymna scolopes Squid by Vibrio fischeri

Published on: March 1, 2012

20.5K
Scanning SQUID Study of Vortex Manipulation by Local Contact
06:53

Scanning SQUID Study of Vortex Manipulation by Local Contact

Published on: February 1, 2017

7.3K
Obtaining Hemocytes from the Hawaiian Bobtail Squid Euprymna scolopes and Observing their Adherence to Symbiotic and Non-Symbiotic Bacteria
05:29

Obtaining Hemocytes from the Hawaiian Bobtail Squid Euprymna scolopes and Observing their Adherence to Symbiotic and Non-Symbiotic Bacteria

Published on: February 11, 2010

13.6K

Area of Science:

  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Superconductivity
  • Spintronics

Background:

  • Conventional spin-singlet superconductors with ferromagnetic layers can exhibit spin-triplet supercurrents.
  • Experimental evidence for spin-triplet supercurrent propagation over long distances in ferromagnets exists.
  • A key theoretical prediction regarding phase shifts in three-magnetic-layer Josephson junctions remains experimentally unverified.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally verify the predicted ground-state phase shift in Josephson junctions with three coplanar magnetic layers.
  • To demonstrate phase controllability by manipulating the magnetization of one layer.
  • To explore potential applications in superconducting computing.

Main Methods:

  • Fabrication of Josephson junctions with three distinct magnetic layers.
  • Design allowing 180° magnetization switching of one layer independently.
  • Phase-sensitive detection utilizing a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID).

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated a ground-state phase shift of 0 or π in the Josephson junction.
  • Phase shift was controllable by altering the relative magnetization orientations.
  • Successful phase-sensitive detection confirmed the junction's properties.

Conclusions:

  • Experimental verification of the predicted phase shift in three-magnetic-layer Josephson junctions.
  • The phase-controllable junction is a viable candidate for memory elements in superconducting computers.
  • Advances in spintronic superconducting devices.