Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Detecting the Ligand-binding Domain Dimerization Activity of Estrogen Receptor Alpha Using the Mammalian Two-Hybrid Assay
Published on: December 19, 2018
Two Unsupported Terminal Hydroxido Ligands in a μ-Oxo-Bridged Ferric Dimer: Protonation and Kinetic Lability Studies
Thomas Philipp Zimmermann1, Thomas Limpke1, Nicole Orth2
1Fakultät für Chemie , Universität Bielefeld , Universitätsstrasse 25 , D-33615 Bielefeld , Germany.
Abstract:
The dinuclear complex [(susan){FeIII(OH)(μ-O)FeIII(OH)}](ClO4)2 (Fe2(OH)2(ClO4)2; susan = 4,7-dimethyl-1,1,10,10-tetra(2-pyridylmethyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazadecane) with two unsupported terminal hydroxido ligands and for comparison the fluorido-substituted complex [(susan){FeIIIF(μ-O)FeIIIF}](ClO4)2 (Fe2F2(ClO4)2) have been synthesized and characterized in the solid state as well in acetonitrile (CH3CN) and water (H2O) solutions. The Fe-OH bonds are strongly modulated by intermolecular hydrogen bonds (1.85 and 1.90 Å). UV-vis-near-IR (NIR) and Mössbauer spectroscopies prove that Fe2F22+ and Fe2(OH)22+ retain their structural integrity in a CH3CN solution. The OH- ligand induces a weaker ligand field than the F- ligand because of stronger π donation. This increased electron donation shifts the potential for the irreversible oxidation by 610 mV cathodically from 1.40 V in Fe2F22+ to 0.79 V versus Fc+/Fc in Fe2(OH)22+. Protonation/deprotonation studies in CH3CN and aqueous solutions of Fe2(OH)22+ provide two reversible acid-base equilibria. UV-vis-NIR, Mössbauer, and cryo electrospray ionization mass spectrometry experiments show conservation of the mono(μ-oxo) bridging motif, while the terminal OH- ligands are protonated to H2O. Titration experiments in aqueous solution at room temperature provide the p Ka values as p K1 = 4.9 and p K2 = 6.8. Kinetic studies by temperature- and pressure-dependent 17O NMR spectrometry revealed for the first time the water-exchange parameters [ kex298 = (3.9 ± 0.2) × 105 s-1, Δ H⧧ = 39.6 ± 0.2 kJ mol-1, Δ S⧧ = -5.1 ± 1 J mol-1 K-1, and Δ V⧧ = +3.0 ± 0.2 cm3 mol-1] and the underlying Id mechanism for a {FeIII(OH2)(μ-O)FeIII(OH2)} core. The same studies suggest that in solution the monoprotonated {FeIII(OH)(μ-O)FeIII(OH2)} complex has μ-O and μ-O2H3 bridges between the two Fe centers.
Related Concept Videos
¹H NMR of Labile Protons: Temporal Resolution
The –OH proton in alcohols typically appears in the range of δ 2 to 5 ppm but can vary depending on the specific...
¹H NMR of Labile Protons: Deuterium (²H) Substitution
Termination of Translation
Design Example: Strain Gauge Bridge or Wheatstone Bridge
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...

