Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

In vivo Imaging of Optic Nerve Fiber Integrity by Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Mice
Published on: July 22, 2014
Fast Temporal Resolution Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Histogram Analysis Versus Visual Analysis for Differentiating
Naoko Mori1,2, Federico D Pineda1, Keiko Tsuchiya1,3
11 Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637.
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to validate a kinetic assessment based on visually identified peak enhancement, which is routinely used in clinical practice, for differentiating benign from malignant lesions during fast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Materials And Methods:
Between January 2015 and December 2016, 90 consecutively registered patients with 105 breast lesions (40 benign, 65 malignant) underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced 1.5-T MRI that included one unenhanced and eight contrast-enhanced fast temporal resolution (10 seconds) whole-breast acquisitions. Histogram analysis was performed to measure the voxel-based enhancement of the entire lesion to obtain 90th, 75th, and 50th percentile values at each time point and to generate kinetic curves. Two observers selected visually identified peak enhancement within the lesions to generate the kinetic curves. The kinetic curves from histogram and visually identified peak enhancement analyses were fitted by means of an empiric mathematic model (EMM): ΔS(t) = A × (1 - e-αt), where A is the upper limit of signal intensity, e indicates the exponential function, and α (min-1) is the rate of increase in signal intensity. The initial slope of the kinetic curve (A × α) and the initial AUC (AUC30) were calculated. These parameters were compared between benign and malignant lesions, and results from visually identified peak enhancement analysis were compared with those from histogram analysis.
Results:
Benign lesions were successfully differentiated from malignant lesions in both visually identified peak enhancement and histogram analyses (90th and 75th percentile values) on the basis of α, A × α, and AUC30 from the EMM. There was no significant difference in ROC AUC in these EMM parameters between visually identified peak enhancement and histogram analyses (p = 0.21).
Conclusion:
Kinetic assessment with visually identified peak enhancement was acceptable for differentiating benign from malignant lesions.
Related Concept Videos
Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...
¹H NMR of Labile Protons: Temporal Resolution
The –OH proton in alcohols typically appears in the range of δ 2 to 5 ppm but can vary depending on the specific...
Probability Histograms
Histogram
A histogram graph consists of contiguous (adjoining) boxes. The heights of the bars correspond to frequency values. The graph will have the same shape with respective labels. The...
¹H NMR of Conformationally Flexible Molecules: Temporal Resolution
Relative Frequency Histogram

