Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.5K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.7K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.7K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.5K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.5K
Linear time-invariant Systems01:23

Linear time-invariant Systems

934
A system is linear if it displays the characteristics of homogeneity and additivity, together termed the superposition property. This principle is fundamental in all linear systems. Linear time-invariant (LTI) systems include systems with linear elements and constant parameters.
The input-output behavior of an LTI system can be fully defined by its response to an impulsive excitation at its input. Once this impulse response is known, the system's reaction to any other input can be...
934
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

3.2K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.2K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.5K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Divalent Cation Doping into SrTiO<sub>3</sub> for Enhancing the Photocatalytic Performance of Water Splitting.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2025
Same author

Improvement on the screening of nonlinear commutator operations in selective coupled-cluster using Lagrangian.

The Journal of chemical physics·2024
Same author

Many-Body-Expansion Based on Variational Quantum Eigensolver and Deflation for Dynamical Correlation.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2024
Same author

Nonunitary projective transcorrelation theory inspired by the F12 ansatz.

The Journal of chemical physics·2023
Same author

Quantum Inverse Algorithm via Adaptive Variational Quantum Linear Solver: Applications to General Eigenstates.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2023
Same author

Improved Algorithms of Quantum Imaginary Time Evolution for Ground and Excited States of Molecular Systems.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 7, 2026

HPLC Coupled with Chemical Fingerprinting for Multi-Pattern Recognition for Identifying the Authenticity of Clematidis Armandii Caulis
07:29

HPLC Coupled with Chemical Fingerprinting for Multi-Pattern Recognition for Identifying the Authenticity of Clematidis Armandii Caulis

Published on: November 11, 2022

2.5K

Orbital-invariant spin-extended approximate coupled-cluster for multi-reference systems.

Takashi Tsuchimochi1, Seiichiro L Ten-No1

  • 1Graduate School of Science, Technology, and Innovation, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo 657-0025, Japan.

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|August 3, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed an approximate spin-extended coupled-cluster (ECC) method to eliminate spin-contamination in quantum chemistry calculations. This approach offers improved accuracy for chemical systems by addressing amplitude equations and solution redundancies.

More Related Videos

Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters
10:37

Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters

Published on: January 9, 2014

11.8K
Implementation of a Reference Interferometer for Nanodetection
16:11

Implementation of a Reference Interferometer for Nanodetection

Published on: April 26, 2014

9.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 7, 2026

HPLC Coupled with Chemical Fingerprinting for Multi-Pattern Recognition for Identifying the Authenticity of Clematidis Armandii Caulis
07:29

HPLC Coupled with Chemical Fingerprinting for Multi-Pattern Recognition for Identifying the Authenticity of Clematidis Armandii Caulis

Published on: November 11, 2022

2.5K
Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters
10:37

Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters

Published on: January 9, 2014

11.8K
Implementation of a Reference Interferometer for Nanodetection
16:11

Implementation of a Reference Interferometer for Nanodetection

Published on: April 26, 2014

9.8K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum Chemistry
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Theoretical Chemistry

Background:

  • Coupled-cluster (CC) methods are essential for accurate electronic structure calculations.
  • Unrestricted CC methods suffer from spin-contamination, affecting results.
  • Spin-extended CC (ECC) aims to resolve spin-contamination but faces challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present an approximate treatment of spin-extended coupled-cluster (ECC) theory.
  • To address and resolve the inherent problems in ECC, namely non-terminating amplitude equations and underdetermined nonlinear equations.
  • To provide a computationally efficient and accurate method for electronic structure calculations.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an approximate ECC by truncating the Taylor series of the exponential ansatz.
  • Introduced an orthogonal projection manifold to remove linear dependencies in the excitation manifold.
  • Proposed an efficient solver for the resulting sparse, non-diagonal-dominant equations.

Main Results:

  • The approximate ECC method rigorously eliminates spin-contamination.
  • The method successfully addresses non-terminating amplitude equations and solution redundancies.
  • The approach is orbital-invariant and yields more accurate results than configuration interaction and linearized CC methods.

Conclusions:

  • The presented approximate ECC method offers a robust and accurate treatment of electron correlation.
  • This work provides a practical approach to overcoming limitations in existing ECC formulations.
  • The method demonstrates significant potential for improving the description of chemical systems in quantum chemistry.