Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

10:07
Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
19.5K
Summary
Doctors
Area of Science:
- Medical Communication
- Psychology in Medicine
- Patient-Doctor Relationship Dynamics
Background:
- Doctor self-disclosure is a key element in medical consultations.
- Understanding different types of self-disclosure (unavoidable, inadvertent, deliberate) is crucial.
- Unmanaged self-disclosure can negatively impact therapeutic outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To categorize types of doctor self-disclosures.
- To analyze the impact of self-disclosure on the doctor-patient relationship.
- To provide guidelines for effective, therapeutic self-disclosure.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of doctor self-disclosure categories: unavoidable, inadvertent, and deliberate.
- Examination of non-verbal and environmental cues in consultations.
- Review of transference dynamics in doctor-patient interactions.
- Development of guidelines for deliberate self-disclosure.
Main Results:
- Unavoidable disclosures (appearance, speech, environment) and inadvertent disclosures (transference) require careful management.
- Deliberate self-disclosure, while common, can be detrimental without proper awareness and strategy.
- Effective self-disclosure strategies can enhance the therapeutic alliance.
Conclusions:
- Managing all forms of doctor self-disclosure is vital for positive therapeutic outcomes.
- Awareness of transference and environmental factors is key to minimizing negative impacts.
- Strategic, informed self-disclosure can strengthen the doctor-patient relationship and improve treatment effectiveness.
More Related Videos
07:48Intraoperative Video Consultation Following Bile Duct Transection Facilitates Direct OR Transfer for Robotic Hepaticojejunostomy at Tertiary Center
Published on: January 9, 2026
778
11:27A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
7.4K
Related Concept Videos
Relationship Formation
46.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
46.2K
Sternberg's Triangular Theory of Love
45.9K
We typically love the people with whom we form relationships, but the type of love we have for our family, friends, and lovers differs. Robert Sternberg (1986) proposed that there are three components of love: intimacy, passion, and commitment. These three components form a triangle that defines multiple types of love: this is known as Sternberg’s triangular theory of love. Intimacy is the sharing of details and intimate thoughts and emotions. Passion is the physical attraction—the...
45.9K
Regression Toward the Mean
7.1K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
7.1K
Groupthink
50.1K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
50.1K
Obedience
35.7K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
35.7K