"Social affiliation in same-class and cross-class interactions": Correction to Coté et al. (2017)

Reports an error in "Social affiliation in same-class and cross-class interactions" by Stéphane Côté, Michael W. Kraus, Nichelle C. Carpenter, Paul K. Piff, Ursula Beermann and Dacher Keltner (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2017[Feb], Vol 146[2], 269-285). In the article, the third sentence of the Parental income section of the Results should read as follows: In particular, the coefficient for the curvature of the line of congruence was consistently positive, suggesting higher affiliation at the extremes than in the middle of the parental income continuum, and supporting our hypothesis. In Figure 3, the graph for Study 4 mistakenly appears in Panel C, and the graph for Study 3 mistakenly appears in Panel D. In Figure 4, the graph for Study 3 mistakenly appears in Panel A, and the graph for Study 2 mistakenly appears in Panel B. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2017-03298-007.) Historically high levels of economic inequality likely have important consequences for relationships between people of the same and different social class backgrounds. Here, we test the prediction that social affiliation among same-class partners is stronger at the extremes of the class spectrum, given that these groups are highly distinctive and most separated from others by institutional and economic forces. An internal meta-analysis of 4 studies (N = 723) provided support for this hypothesis. Participant and partner social class were interactively, rather than additively, associated with social affiliation, indexed by affiliative behaviors and emotions during structured laboratory interactions and in daily life. Further, response surface analyses revealed that paired upper or lower class partners generally affiliated more than average-class pairs. Analyses with separate class indices suggested that these patterns are driven more by parental income and subjective social class than by parental education. The findings illuminate the dynamics of same- and cross-class interactions, revealing that not all same-class interactions feature the same degree of affiliation. They also reveal the importance of studying social class from an intergroup perspective. (PsycINFO Database Record