Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

A Novel Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Juvenile Rats
Published on: December 8, 2014
A systematic review and quality analysis of pediatric traumatic brain injury clinical practice guidelines
Roselyn Appenteng1, Taylor Nelp2, Jihad Abdelgadir3
1Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Insights
This study reviewed pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), finding most were from high-income countries and varied in quality. Developing targeted pediatric TBI guidelines is crucial for improving care, especially in resource-limited settings.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric neurosurgery
- Clinical practice guideline development
- Evidence-based medicine
Background:
- Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) are a major cause of death and disability in children worldwide.
- Adherence to evidence-based guidelines improves TBI outcomes.
- Assessing existing pediatric TBI guidelines is vital for developing new ones, particularly for low and middle-income countries.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the quality of available clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the acute management of pediatric TBI.
- To inform the creation of a pediatric TBI management guideline tailored for low and middle-income country contexts.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and appraisal of CPGs for pediatric TBI acute management (1995-2016).
- Searched multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, LILACS, etc.).
- Appraised 17 selected CPGs using the AGREE II instrument by seven independent reviewers.
Main Results:
- 17 CPGs were appraised, with most (16/17) originating from high-income countries.
- The New Zealand Guideline Group (2006) and Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee (2016) received the highest quality scores.
- Applicability and editorial independence were the lowest-scoring domains, indicating challenges in practical implementation.
Conclusions:
- This is the first systematic review and appraisal of pediatric TBI CPGs.
- Creating pediatric-specific guidelines can enhance the quality of acute TBI care.
- Addressing guideline applicability is essential for translating evidence into practice, especially in resource-limited settings.
Background:
Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) are a significant cause of mortality and morbidity for children globally. Adherence to evidence-based treatment guidelines have been shown to improve TBI outcomes. To inform the creation of a pediatric TBI management guideline for a low and middle income country context, we assessed the quality of available clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the acute management pediatric TBI.
Methods:
Articles were identified and retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Africa-Wide Information and Global Index Medicus. These articles were screened by four reviewers independently. Based on the eligibility criteria, with the exception of literature reviews, opinion papers and editor's letters, articles published from 1995 to November 11, 2016 which covered clinical recommendations, clinical practice or treatment guidelines for the acute management of pediatric TBI (within 24 hours) were included for review. A reference and citation analysis was performed. Seven independent reviewers from low, middle and high income clinical settings with knowledge of pediatric TBI management appraised the guidelines using the AGREE II instrument. Scores for the CPGs were aggregated by domain and overall assessment was determined.
Results:
We screened 2372 articles of which 17 were retained for data extraction and guideline appraisal. Except for one CPG from a middle income country, the majority (16/17) of the guidelines were developed in high income countries. Seven guidelines were developed specifically for the pediatric population, while the remaining CPGs addressed the acute management of TBI in both adult and pediatric populations. The New Zealand Guideline Group (NZGG, 2006) received the highest overall assessment score of 46/49 (93.88%) followed by the Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee (SNC, 2016) with a score of 45/49 (91.84%) followed by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN, 2009) and Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF 2012) both with scores of 44/49 (89.80%). CPGs from Cincinnati Children's Hospital (CCH 2006) and Sao Paulo Medical School Hospital/Brazilian Society of Neurosurgery (USP/BSN, 2001) received the lowest score of 27/49 (55.10%) subsequently followed by the Appropriateness Criteria (ACR, 2015) with 29/49 (59.18%). The domains for scope and purpose and clarity of presentation received the highest scores across the CPGs, while applicability and editorial independence domains had the lowest scores with a wider variability in score range for rigor of development and stakeholder involvement.
Conclusions:
To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and guideline appraisal for pediatric CPGs concerning the acute management of TBI. Targeted guideline creation specific to the pediatric population has the potential to improve the quality of acute TBI CPGs. Furthermore, it is crucial to address the applicability of a guideline to translate the CPG from a published manuscript into clinically relevant local practice tools and for resource limited practice settings.
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations
Random and Systematic Errors
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.

