Adaptive threshold hunting reveals differences in interhemispheric inhibition between young and older adults
Ronan A Mooney1,2, John Cirillo1,2, Winston D Byblow1,2
1Department of Exercise Sciences, Movement Neuroscience Laboratory, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Abstract:
Interhemispheric inhibition between bilateral motor cortices is important for the performance of unimanual activities and may be compromised with advancing age. Conventionally, interhemispheric inhibition is assessed using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with constant conditioning and test stimulation parameters. Adaptive threshold hunting TMS, whereby a target motor-evoked potential amplitude is maintained in the presence of the conditioning, may provide an alternative means of assessment. Furthermore, interhemispheric inhibition may suppress late indirect-waves more so than early indirect-waves which can be preferentially elicited using anterior-posterior (AP) and posterior-anterior (PA) induced currents, respectively. The aim of this study was to assess age-related effects on interhemispheric inhibition using both conventional and threshold hunting techniques with PA- and AP-induced current. In 15 young and 15 older adults, short (10 ms) and long (40 ms) interval interhemispheric inhibition was examined in the nondominant extensor carpi radialis muscle at rest and during voluntary extension of the contralateral wrist. With the conventional technique, there were no age-related differences in short-interval interhemispheric inhibition. With threshold hunting and AP-induced current, young adults exhibited greater short-interval interhemispheric inhibition during contralateral activation compared with rest and compared with older adults. Furthermore, long-interval interhemispheric inhibition was greater in older adults compared with young for both conventional and threshold hunting techniques. Age-related differences in interhemispheric inhibition are evident with threshold hunting using PA- and AP-induced current.
Related Concept Videos
Feedback Inhibition
Electric Potential and Potential Difference
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Sum and Difference OpAmps
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
Enzyme Inhibition


