Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Pulmonary Perfusion using Calibrated Arterial Spin Labeling
Published on: May 30, 2011
Arterial Spin-Labeling in Children with Brain Tumor: A Meta-Analysis
A F Delgado1, F De Luca2, P Hanagandi3
1From the Departments of Clinical Neuroscience (Anna F.D.) anna.falk-delgado@sll.se.
Arterial spin-labeling (ASL) accurately distinguishes low- and high-grade brain tumors in children. Relative cerebral blood flow (CBF) derived from ASL showed less variability, offering a reliable diagnostic tool for pediatric brain tumors.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Pediatric Oncology
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Arterial spin-labeling (ASL) is a non-invasive MRI technique to measure cerebral blood flow (CBF).
- The diagnostic value of ASL in pediatric brain tumors has not been previously evaluated through meta-analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the diagnostic accuracy of ASL-derived CBF in differentiating between low- and high-grade pediatric brain tumors.
- To assess the reliability of both relative and absolute CBF measurements.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library).
- Included studies involved pediatric patients with ASL MRI and confirmed neuropathologic diagnoses.
- Bivariate meta-analysis and meta-regression were employed to synthesize data and explore heterogeneity.
Main Results:
- Eight studies with 286 pediatric patients were included in the meta-analysis.
- ASL demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, with pooled sensitivity and specificity for relative CBF ranging from 0.75-0.90 and 0.77-0.92, respectively (AUC = 0.92).
- Relative CBF exhibited less heterogeneity (I² = 38) compared to absolute CBF (I² = 74), indicating greater consistency across studies.
Conclusions:
- ASL-derived CBF measurements are highly accurate for discriminating low- and high-grade pediatric brain tumors.
- Relative CBF measurements from ASL are more consistent across studies than absolute CBF, making them a valuable tool for clinical assessment.
Related Concept Videos
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...

