[Certification in cardiology : Contra: The concept should be improved]

Increasing complexity and new highly differentiated therapeutic procedures in cardiology result in a need for additional training beyond cardiology board certification. The German Cardiac Society therefore developed a variety of certifications of educational curricula and definition of specialized centers. Standardization and structuring in education and patient treatment, as defined by certifications may be helpful; however, introduction of certification can have serious consequences for hospital structure, the side effects of which may impair quality of treatment for individual patients. The current article discusses these issues against the background of the following questions: how is quality defined? How do certifications interfere with patient care on a nationwide level, how do they influence responsibilities and teamwork? Are there conflicts of interests by designing certifications and how good are the organizational structures? Finally, suggestions are made on what has to be considered when designing certifications. Certifications should acknowledge all cardiologists, irrespective of their position in the level of care. There should be a coherent unified concept synchronizing all certifications and administration needs to be transparent and well structured.