Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Utilizing semantic intrusions to identify amyloid positivity in mild cognitive impairment
David A Loewenstein1, Rosie E Curiel2, Steven DeKosky2
1From the Center on Aging (D.A.L., R.E.C.) and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (D.A.L., R.E.C.), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; Wien Center for Alzheimer's Disease and Memory Disorders (D.A.L., A.P., W.W.B., S.G., M.T.G.-C., R.D.), Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach; McKnight Brain Institute (S.D.), Department of Neurology (S.D., R.D.), Department of Clinical and Health Psychology (R.M.B.), Center for Translational Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases (T.G.), and Clinical and Translational Science Institute (K.S.H., M.M.), University of Florida, Gainesville; Department of Psychology (M.R.), Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton; FLENI Foundation (S.M.G.), University of Buenos Aires Schools of Medicine and Psychology, Argentina; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (M.A., C.L., G.L.), College of Engineering and Computing, Florida International University Center for Advanced Technology and Education; and Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine (R.D.), Florida International University, Miami. DLoewenstein@med.miami.edu.
Objective:
Semantic intrusion (SI) errors may highlight specific breakdowns in memory associated with preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD); however, there have been no investigations to determine whether SI errors occur with greater frequency in persons with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) confirmed as amyloid positive (Amy+) vs those who have clinical symptoms of aMCI-AD with negative amyloid scans (suspected non-AD pathology [SNAP]) or persons who are diagnosed with other brain disorders affecting cognition.
Methods:
Eighty-eight participants with aMCI underwent brain amyloid PET and MRI scans and were classified as early AD (Amy+), SNAP (Amy-), or other neurological/psychiatric diagnosis (Amy-). We focused on SI on the Loewenstein-Acevedo Scales for Semantic Interference and Learning (LASSI-L) targeting proactive semantic interference (PSI; old semantic learning interferes with new semantic learning), failure to recover from PSI after an additional learning trial (frPSI), and retroactive semantic interference (new semantic learning interferes with memory for old semantic learning).
Results:
SIs on measures of PSI and frPSI distinguished between Amy+ AD and SNAP and other non-AD cases. PSI and frPSI intrusions evidenced moderately high associations with reduced volumes in the entorhinal cortex, superior temporal regions, and supramarginal gyrus. No such associations were observed in cases with SNAP.
Conclusions:
SIs on the LASSI-L related to PSI and frPSI uniquely differentiated Amy+ and Amy- participants with aMCI and likely reflect deficits with inhibition and source memory in preclinical AD not captured by traditional cognitive measures. This may represent a specific, noninvasive test successful at distinguishing cases with true AD from those with SNAP.
Insights
Semantic intrusion errors on the LASSI-L test can identify early Alzheimer disease (AD) by distinguishing amyloid-positive (Amy+) mild cognitive impairment from suspected non-AD pathology (SNAP). This may offer a noninvasive method for early AD diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neurology
Background:
- Semantic intrusion (SI) errors may indicate memory deficits in preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD).
- Previous research has not compared SI error frequency in amyloid-positive (Amy+) amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) versus suspected non-AD pathology (SNAP) or other neurological conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether semantic intrusion errors differ between individuals with Amy+ aMCI, SNAP, and other non-AD diagnoses.
- To determine if SI errors correlate with brain atrophy in specific regions.
Main Methods:
- Eighty-eight aMCI participants underwent amyloid PET and MRI scans.
- Participants were classified into early AD (Amy+), SNAP (Amy-), or other neurological/psychiatric diagnosis (Amy-).
- Semantic interference (SI) was assessed using the Loewenstein-Acevedo Scales for Semantic Interference and Learning (LASSI-L), focusing on proactive semantic interference (PSI), failure to recover from PSI (frPSI), and retroactive semantic interference.
Main Results:
- SI errors on measures of PSI and frPSI successfully differentiated Amy+ AD cases from SNAP and other non-AD cases.
- PSI and frPSI intrusions were associated with reduced volumes in the entorhinal cortex, superior temporal regions, and supramarginal gyrus in Amy+ AD.
- No such associations were found in SNAP cases.
Conclusions:
- Semantic intrusion errors on the LASSI-L, specifically related to PSI and frPSI, uniquely differentiate Amy+ from Amy- participants with aMCI.
- These findings suggest that SI errors reflect deficits in inhibition and source memory in preclinical AD, potentially offering a noninvasive diagnostic tool.
- This method may successfully distinguish true AD cases from those with SNAP.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Amyloid Fibrils
Amyloid deposits were observed as early as 1639 in the liver and the spleen. In 1854, Rudolph Virchow performed iodine staining,...
Amyloid Fibrils
Cognitive Dissonance
Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device
Position-effect Variegation
Serial Position Effect

