Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
Published on: April 29, 2014
Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of the diffusion parameter EStImation with Gibbs and NoisE removal pipeline
Benjamin Ades-Aron1, Jelle Veraart1, Peter Kochunov2
1Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, NY, USA.
Abstract:
This work evaluates the accuracy and precision of the Diffusion parameter EStImation with Gibbs and NoisE Removal (DESIGNER) pipeline, developed to identify and minimize common sources of methodological variability including: thermal noise, Gibbs ringing artifacts, Rician bias, EPI and eddy current induced spatial distortions, and motion-related artifacts. Following this processing pipeline, iterative parameter estimation techniques were used to derive diffusion parameters of interest based on the diffusion tensor and kurtosis tensor. We evaluated accuracy using a software phantom based on 36 diffusion datasets from the Human Connectome project and tested the precision by analyzing data from 30 healthy volunteers scanned three times within one week. Preprocessing with both DESIGNER or a standard pipeline based on smoothing (instead of noise removal) improved parameter precision by up to a factor of 2 compared to preprocessing with motion correction alone. When evaluating accuracy, we report average decreases in bias (deviation from simulated parameters) over all included regions for fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, mean kurtosis, and axonal water fraction of 9.7%, 8.7%, 4.2%, and 7.6% using DESIGNER compared to the standard pipeline, demonstrating that preprocessing with DESIGNER improves accuracy compared to other processing methods.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Accuracy and Precision
Gibbs Free Energy
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter
Diffusion
Diffusion

