Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure
Published on: December 13, 2024
Microbiome Composition in Both Wild-Type and Disease Model Mice Is Heavily Influenced by Mouse Facility
Kristopher D Parker1, Shannon E Albeke2, Jason P Gigley1
1Department of Molecular Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, United States.
Abstract:
Murine models have become essential tools for understanding the complex interactions between gut microbes, their hosts, and disease. While many intra-facility factors are known to influence the structure of mouse microbiomes, the contribution of inter-facility variation to mouse microbiome composition, especially in the context of disease, remains under-investigated. We replicated microbiome experiments using identical mouse lines housed in two separate animal facilities and report drastic differences in composition of microbiomes based upon animal facility of origin. We observed facility-specific microbiome signatures in the context of a disease model [the Ednrb (endothelin receptor type B) Hirschsprung disease mouse] and in normal C57BL/6J mice. Importantly, these facility differences were independent of cage, sex, or sequencing-related influence. In addition, we investigated the reproducibility of microbiome dysbiosis previously associated with Ednrb-/- (knock-out; KO) mice. While we observed genotype-based differences in composition between wild-type (WT) and KO mice, these differences were inconsistent with the previously reported conclusions. Furthermore, the genotype-based differences were not identical across animal facilities. Despite this, through differential abundance testing, we identified several conserved candidate taxa and candidate operational taxonomic units that may play a role in disease promotion or protection. Overall, our findings raise the possibility that previously reported microbiome-disease associations from murine studies conducted in a single facility may be heavily influenced by facility-specific effects. More generally, these results provide a strong rationale for replication of mouse microbiome studies at multiple facilities, and for the meticulous collection of metadata that will allow the confounding effects of facility to be more specifically identified.
Insights
Animal facility origin drastically alters mouse gut microbiome composition, impacting disease studies. Replicating experiments across facilities is crucial for reliable microbiome-disease association research.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Animal Models
- Genetics
Background:
- Murine models are vital for studying gut microbe-host-disease interactions.
- Intra-facility factors influencing mouse microbiomes are known, but inter-facility variation is under-investigated.
- Understanding facility effects is critical for microbiome research reproducibility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of animal facility origin on mouse gut microbiome composition.
- To assess the reproducibility of microbiome dysbiosis in a Hirschsprung disease model.
- To identify conserved microbial taxa associated with disease or protection.
Main Methods:
- Replication of microbiome experiments in identical mouse lines across two separate animal facilities.
- Comparison of microbiome composition in normal C57BL/6J mice and Ednrb (endothelin receptor type B) Hirschsprung disease model mice.
- Differential abundance testing to identify conserved microbial taxa.
Main Results:
- Drastic differences in gut microbiome composition were observed based solely on animal facility of origin.
- Facility-specific microbiome signatures were present in both normal and disease model mice.
- Genotype-based microbiome differences in the Ednrb model were inconsistent across facilities and with prior reports.
- Conserved microbial taxa potentially involved in disease were identified despite facility variations.
Conclusions:
- Facility of origin is a major confounding factor in mouse microbiome studies.
- Replication of microbiome studies across multiple facilities is essential for robust findings.
- Meticulous metadata collection is needed to account for facility-specific effects in microbiome research.
More Related Videos
06:23A Chronic Sleep Fragmentation Model using Vibrating Orbital Rotor to Induce Cognitive Deficit and Anxiety-Like Behavior in Young Wild-Type Mice
Published on: September 22, 2020
08:14A Method to Define the Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Colon Microbiome Biodiversity in a Mouse Colon Tumor Model
Published on: February 28, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Factors Influencing Drug Absorption: Disease States and Pharmacology
Substances such as alcohol and specific drugs, including antineoplastics, can also negatively impact drug absorption. For instance,...
Classifying Matter by Composition
According to its composition, the matter can be classified into two broad categories — pure substances and mixtures.
A pure substance is a form of matter that has a constant composition throughout with uniform properties. For example, any sample of sucrose has the same composition and same physical properties, such as melting point, color, and sweetness, regardless of the source from which it is isolated.
A mixture is composed of two or...
Composite Bodies
Composite bodies have widespread applications in mechanical engineering, from automobiles to aircraft to rockets. For example, an automobile wheel comprises...
Composition of Blood
Formed elements constitute the remaining 45% of the blood volume. These...
The Influence of Affect on Cognition
The Influence of Cognition on Affect