Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

8.0K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
8.0K
Frames01:30

Frames

847
Frames are essential components of various mechanical and structural systems used daily. These structures are known for their stability and ability to bear heavy loads. A frame is constructed using two-force and multi-force members, interconnected using pin joints. In contrast, trusses are made entirely of two-force members.
Frames are versatile and widely used in various applications such as structural supports for beams and columns, automobile chassis construction, and in the construction...
847
Frames: Problem Solving II01:26

Frames: Problem Solving II

504
Consider a hydraulic hoist supporting a load of 1 kN. Assuming a simplified schematic representation of this frame structure, the force acting on BD and BF members can be determined.
504
Frames: Problem Solving I01:24

Frames: Problem Solving I

979
Consider a jib crane with an external load suspended from the pulley. The dimensions of the crane members are shown in the figure. A systematic analysis of the frame structure is required to determine the reaction forces at the pin joints, assuming that the pulleys are frictionless.
979
Structural Joints: Synovial Joints01:16

Structural Joints: Synovial Joints

7.0K
Synovial joints are the most common type of joint in the body. A key structural characteristic for a synovial joint is the presence of a joint cavity. This fluid-filled space is where the articulating surfaces of the bones contact each other. Also, unlike fibrous or cartilaginous joints, the articulating bone surfaces at a synovial joint are not directly connected to each other with fibrous connective tissue or cartilage. This gives the bones of a synovial joint the ability to move smoothly...
7.0K
Structural Joints: Fibrous Joints01:03

Structural Joints: Fibrous Joints

3.8K
Fibrous joints are a type of joint where the bones are connected by fibrous connective tissue. These joints provide stability and minimal to no movement between the articulating bones. There are three types of fibrous joints.
Suture
All the bones of the skull, except for the mandible, are joined to each other by a fibrous joint called a suture. The fibrous connective tissue found at a suture strongly unites the adjacent skull bones and thus helps to protect the brain and form the face. In...
3.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A customized system for whole-body vibration measurement.

Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene·2026
Same author

Quantifying supine human discomfort in off-road whole-body vibration.

Ergonomics·2022
Same author

Joint Center Estimation Using Single-Frame Optimization: Part 1: Numerical Simulation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2018
Same author

Comparison of tibiofemoral joint space width measurements from standing CT and fixed flexion radiography.

Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Estimating Sediment Denitrification Rates Using Cores and N2O Microsensors
07:59

Estimating Sediment Denitrification Rates Using Cores and N2O Microsensors

Published on: December 6, 2018

8.6K

Joint Center Estimation Using Single-Frame Optimization: Part 2: Experimentation.

Eric Frick1, Salam Rahmatalla2

  • 1Center for Computer-Aided Design, College of Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. eric-frick@uiowa.edu.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|August 8, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Single-frame optimization (SFO) shows promise for human motion capture by reducing soft tissue artifact (STA) errors. This method achieves accuracy comparable to optical markers, improving joint center estimation.

Keywords:
inertial sensorsjoint centermotion captureoptical markerssoft tissue artifact

More Related Videos

High Pressure Single Crystal Diffraction at PX^2
11:32

High Pressure Single Crystal Diffraction at PX^2

Published on: January 16, 2017

22.1K
Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
03:43

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists

Published on: July 11, 2025

783

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Estimating Sediment Denitrification Rates Using Cores and N2O Microsensors
07:59

Estimating Sediment Denitrification Rates Using Cores and N2O Microsensors

Published on: December 6, 2018

8.6K
High Pressure Single Crystal Diffraction at PX^2
11:32

High Pressure Single Crystal Diffraction at PX^2

Published on: January 16, 2017

22.1K
Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
03:43

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists

Published on: July 11, 2025

783

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Motion Analysis
  • Sensor Technology

Background:

  • Human motion capture accuracy relies on precise joint center estimation.
  • Soft tissue artifact (STA) significantly introduces errors in joint center calculations.
  • Existing methods for STA mitigation require further experimental validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally compare the single-frame optimization (SFO) method for STA mitigation with traditional marker-based solutions.
  • To evaluate the accuracy and time-variance correlation of SFO in human joint motion simulation.
  • To assess SFO's potential to improve joint center estimation in motion capture.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated human joint motion using a single-degree-of-freedom pendulum.
  • Induced STA by indirectly attaching an inertial measurement unit (IMU) via vacuum-sealed meat.
  • Utilized redundant optical and inertial instrumentation for simultaneous data acquisition.
  • Determined time-varying joint center solutions using both optical markers and SFO.

Main Results:

  • SFO achieved accuracy comparable to state-of-the-art optical marker methods (RMSE: 7.87–37.86 mm).
  • Time variances of SFO solutions demonstrated strong correlation with true joint center solutions (r = 0.58–0.99).
  • Experimental results validate SFO's efficacy in mitigating STA effects.

Conclusions:

  • Single-frame optimization (SFO) offers a viable alternative for reducing soft tissue artifact in motion capture.
  • SFO shows potential to enhance the reliability and accuracy of joint center estimations.
  • This study supports SFO's application in improving human motion analysis and characterization of STA.