Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Isolation and Culture of Hippocampal Neurons from Prenatal Mice
Published on: July 26, 2012
Polygenic differential susceptibility to prenatal adversity
Jay Belsky1, Irina Pokhvisneva2, Anu Sathyan Sathyapalan Rema3
1Department of Human Ecology,Program in Human Development,University of California,Davis.
Insights
Gene-environment interactions influence child behavior. This study suggests these interactions may reflect a diathesis-stress model, but more research is needed on supportive prenatal environments.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Behavioral Genetics
- Psychiatric Epidemiology
Background:
- Previous research identified gene × environment interactions between prenatal adversity and serotonin transporter gene networks predicting child problem behaviors.
- The specific nature of these gene × environment interactions (e.g., diathesis-stress vs. differential susceptibility) remained unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether observed gene × environment interactions align with diathesis-stress or differential-susceptibility models.
- To clarify the mechanisms underlying the relationship between genetic predispositions, prenatal environment, and child behavioral outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Utilized six additional analyses on existing data involving a serotonin transporter-gene network polygenic score and a prenatal adversity index.
- Employed statistical approaches including regions of significance and proportion of interaction/cases affected indices.
Main Results:
- Analyses of the regions of significance and proportion of interaction index supported a diathesis-stress model.
- The proportion of cases affected index favored a differential-susceptibility model, potentially due to the limited range of the adversity measure.
- Findings indicate a complex interplay between genetic factors and prenatal experiences.
Conclusions:
- The findings suggest that gene × environment interactions in child behavior may operate through both diathesis-stress and differential-susceptibility pathways.
- Future research should incorporate a broader spectrum of prenatal experiences, including supportive factors, for a more comprehensive understanding.
- Clarifying these interaction models is crucial for developing targeted interventions.
Abstract:
A recent article in this journal reported a number of gene × environment interactions involving a serotonin transporter-gene network polygenic score and a composite index of prenatal adversity predicting several problem behavior outcomes at 48 months (e.g., anxious/depressed, pervasive developmental problems) and at 60 months (e.g., withdrawal, internalizing problems), yet did not illuminate the nature or form these genetic × environment interactions took. Here we report results of six additional analyses to evaluate whether these interactions reflected diathesis-stress or differential-susceptibility related processes. Analyses of the regions of significance and proportion of interaction index are consistent with the diathesis-stress model, seemingly because of the truncated nature of the adversity score (which did not extend to supportive/positive prenatal experiences/exposures); in contrast, the proportion (of cases) affected index favors the differential-susceptibility model. These results suggest the need for future studies to extend measurement of the prenatal environment to highly supportive experiences and exposures.
Related Concept Videos
Polygenic Traits
Magnetic Susceptibility and Permeability
When diamagnetic materials are placed under an external magnetic field, the moments opposite to the field are induced. Hence, the susceptibility for diamagnets has a minimal negative value of 10-5–10-6. Since...
Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects
Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, local anesthetics can affect the organs that depend on the functioning of sodium...
Susceptibility, Permittivity and Dielectric Constant
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...

