Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Association between baseline platelet count and severe adverse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention
Wan-Jun Cheng1, Shi-Wei Yang1, Fei Gao1
1Beijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Disease, The Key Laboratory of Remodeling-related Cardiovascular Disease, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Insights
This study found no significant link between baseline platelet count and adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Platelet levels did not predict mortality or major bleeding in patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hematology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Platelet count (PC) is a readily available biomarker.
- Its role in predicting outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains debated.
- Real-world data on baseline PC and severe adverse events post-PCI are crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the association between baseline platelet count (PC) and severe adverse outcomes following PCI.
- To evaluate the prognostic value of low, normal, and high baseline PC in a large real-world cohort.
- To determine if baseline PC predicts mortality or major bleeding after PCI.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 18,788 patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents.
- Patients stratified into low (< 150 × 1000/µL), normal (150-300 × 1000/µL), and high (≥ 300 × 1000/µL) baseline PC groups.
- Primary endpoints: in-hospital and follow-up all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoint: major bleeding requiring transfusion.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in in-hospital (0.6% vs 0.4% vs 0.4%) or follow-up mortality (0.9% vs 0.6% vs 0.7%) across PC groups (P=0.259 and P=0.079).
- Multivariate analysis showed no increased mortality risk for low or high PC compared to normal PC.
- No significant difference in major bleeding rates (0.5% vs 0.3% vs 0.3%; P=0.320) or increased risk after adjustment.
Conclusions:
- Baseline platelet count is not significantly associated with severe adverse outcomes after PCI in current real-world practice.
- The study did not find an independent prognostic value for baseline PC, except possibly in transfemoral PCI subgroups.
- These findings suggest PC is not a reliable predictor of mortality or major bleeding post-PCI.
Objective:
The aim is to evaluate the association between baseline platelet count (PC) and severe adverse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in current real-world practice.
Methods:
A total of 18,788 patients underwent PCI with drug-eluting stents constituted the study population. Patients were categorized as having low (< 150 × 1000/µL), normal (150-300 × 1000/µL), and high (≥ 300 × 1000/µL) baseline PC. The primary endpoints included in-hospital and follow-up all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was major bleeding requiring a blood transfusion.
Results:
In-hospital mortality rates for patients with low, normal, and high baseline PC were 0.6%, 0.4%, and 0.4%, respectively (P = 0.259). Similarly, mortality rates during long-term follow-up (median 23.8 months) for patients with low, normal, and high baseline PC were 0.9%, 0.6%, and 0.7%, respectively (P = 0.079). After multivariate adjustment, patients with low or high baseline PC tended to have similar risks for both in-hospital and follow-up mortality compared with the normal group. Subgroup analyses failed to demonstrate an independent prognostic value of baseline PC in specific population groups except patients who undwent transfemoral PCI. There was also no significant difference in the incidence of major bleeding requiring a blood transfusion in the low, normal, and high groups (0.5%, 0.3%, and 0.3%, respectively; P = 0.320). After multivariate adjustment, low or high baseline PC did not significantly increase the risk of major bleeding.
Conclusion:
There is no significant association between baseline PC and severe adverse outcomes following PCI in current real-world practice.
More Related Videos
06:39Novel Percutaneous Approach for Deployment of 3D Printed Coronary Stenosis Implants in Swine Models of Ischemic Heart Disease
Published on: February 18, 2020
05:49Procoagulant Platelet Characterization by Measuring Phosphatidylserine Exposure and Microvesicle Release from Human Purified Platelets
Published on: November 29, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects
Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, local anesthetics can affect the organs that depend on the functioning of sodium...
Association Areas of the Cortex
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...