Efficacy of different doses of dexmedetomidine as a rapid bolus for children: a double-blind, prospective, randomized

Fang Chen1,2, Chengyu Wang2, Yi Lu2

  • 1Department of Pain Management, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, 324 Jingwu Road, Jinan, 250021, China.

BMC Anesthesiology
|August 9, 2018
PubMed

Insights

Rapid bolus administration of dexmedetomidine (DEX) effectively prevents and treats emergence agitation (EA) in children. Higher doses of DEX reduced EA incidence with transient decreases in heart rate and blood pressure, showing good tolerance.

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Pediatric Anesthesia
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is an alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist with sedative, anxiolytic, and analgesic properties.
  • DEX is recognized for preventing and treating emergence agitation (EA) in pediatric patients.
  • Standard administration involves a 10-minute infusion, but rapid bolus injection may be a suitable alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of different doses of DEX administered as a rapid intravenous bolus for the prevention and treatment of EA in children.
  • To compare the effects of various DEX dosages on hemodynamic parameters and recovery profiles.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 100 pediatric patients divided into five groups: control and four DEX dosage groups (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0 μg/kg).
  • Hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, mean blood pressure, oxygen saturation) were monitored closely post-injection.
  • Incidence of EA, pain, and adverse events were assessed in the post-anesthesia care unit.

Main Results:

  • Groups receiving 0.75 μg/kg (D4) and 1.0 μg/kg (D5) of DEX showed a significantly lower incidence of EA compared to the control group (D1).
  • All DEX groups experienced significant decreases in heart rate and mean blood pressure compared to the control group.
  • Higher DEX doses led to a prolonged duration of minimal heart rate, but no interventions were required; recovery time also increased with dosage.

Conclusions:

  • Rapid IV bolus administration of 0.75 and 1.0 μg/kg DEX is effective in reducing EA incidence in children.
  • Despite transient decreases in heart rate and blood pressure, DEX was well-tolerated, suggesting it is a viable option for EA management.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
13.6K
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children01:29

Drug Dosing: Infants and Children

Pediatric patient dosages diverge from adults due to disparities in body surface area, total body water, and extracellular fluid per kilogram of body weight. The dosing regimen considers the variations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacology across distinct age groups, encompassing preterm newborns, infants, young children, older children, and adolescents. Calculation of pediatric patient doses is predicated on determining body surface area, which exhibits a superior correlation with the child's...
307
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy01:22

Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy

The potency of a drug is the measure of its ability to produce a biological response and can be compared by looking at the half-maximum effective concentration or EC50 values of different drugs. A lower EC50 value indicates higher potency of the drug. In the dose–response curve of two antihypertensive drugs, candesartan and irbesartan, a significant difference is observed in their EC50 values. A lower EC50 value for candesartan indicates that it is more potent than irbesartan, as it...
6.6K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
4.0K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
250
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies01:11

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
246