Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Qualitative and Comparative Cortical Activity Data Analyses from a Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Experiment Applying Block Design
Published on: December 3, 2020
Decentralization, national context and environmental policy performance: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis
1College of Public Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, No.18, Xuezheng Str., Xiasha University Town, Hangzhou, 310018, China. mym@zjgsu.edu.cn.
Decentralization impacts environmental policy performance differently across political, fiscal, and administrative dimensions. Favorable national contexts and fiscal/administrative decentralization are key to high environmental policy performance.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Policy and Governance
- Comparative Politics
- Public Administration
Background:
- Understanding the drivers of effective environmental policy performance is crucial for sustainable development.
- Decentralization is increasingly adopted globally, but its impact on environmental outcomes is complex and context-dependent.
- Existing research often overlooks the interplay between different forms of decentralization and national contextual factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between three dimensions of decentralization (political, fiscal, administrative) and environmental policy performance.
- To identify distinct pathways and configurations of decentralization and national context leading to high or low environmental policy performance.
- To provide actionable insights for policymakers on optimizing decentralization strategies for environmental governance.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional data analysis from 118 countries.
- Multiple regression analysis to assess the impact of decentralization dimensions.
- Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to explore configurational pathways.
Main Results:
- Political, fiscal, and administrative decentralization have varied effects on environmental policy performance.
- Multiple configurations of decentralization and national context lead to varying levels of environmental policy success.
- High performance is associated with fiscal and administrative decentralization within favorable contexts (advanced economy, good governance, strict regulations).
- Low performance often results from fiscal centralization, irrespective of other decentralization forms, particularly in unfavorable contexts.
Conclusions:
- The effectiveness of decentralization in environmental policy is contingent on its specific form and the national context.
- A configurational approach, considering the interplay of decentralization types and contextual factors, is essential for effective environmental governance.
- Policymakers should tailor decentralization strategies to specific national contexts for improved environmental outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Qualitative Analysis
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
National Nursing Organizations I
National Nursing Organizations II
The AACN emphasizes a healthy work environment through six standards to achieve an optimal patient outcome. The standards are appropriate staffing, meaningful recognition, collaboration, authentic leadership, effective communication, and decision-making. In addition, AACN provides certification programs, webinars, journals, and...
Self Within Cultural Contexts

