Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

08:38
Extraction and Analysis of Cortisol from Human and Monkey Hair
Published on: January 24, 2014
29.1K
Hand preferences and differences in extractive foraging in seven capuchin monkey species
Antonio C de Andrade1, Allana B de Sousa1
1Universidade Federal da Paraiba, Centro de Ciencias Aplicadas e Educacao, Departamento de Engenharia e Meio Ambiente, Rio Tinto, Paraíba, Brazil.
American Journal of Primatology
|August 9, 2018
Summary
Capuchin monkeys show varied hand preferences, challenging the simple link between tool use and right-handedness. Extractive foraging and habitat may influence handedness in these primates.
Area of Science:
- Primate behavior
- Animal cognition
- Comparative psychology
Background:
- Tool use and extractive foraging are hypothesized drivers of hand preference in primates.
- Robust capuchins (Sapajus) are more specialized for extractive foraging than gracile capuchins (Cebus).
- Previous assumptions linked tool use to right-hand preference.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate hand preference and extractive foraging rates in seven capuchin species.
- To test the hypothesis that dry habitat capuchins show higher extractive foraging and right-hand preference.
- To examine the relationship between tool use, extractive foraging, and lateralization in Sapajus.
Main Methods:
- Tube task assessing hand preference in 152 individuals.
- Extractive foraging task assessing foraging behavior in 212 individuals.
- Focal and scan sampling used for data collection in captive settings.
Main Results:
- Sapajus libidinosus exhibited significant left-hand preference, contrary to predictions.
- Sapajus robustus and S. flavius showed right-hand preference.
- Gracile capuchins displayed a stronger left-hand bias than robust capuchins.
- Extractive foraging rates varied significantly across species, with S. xanthosternos, S. flavius, and S. robustus foraging more.
Conclusions:
- The link between tool use and right-hand preference is more complex than previously thought, especially in Sapajus.
- Population-level left-handedness was observed in S. libidinosus, a tool-using species.
- Differences in food resources and selective pressures, particularly reliance on bimanual feeding and complex foraging, likely explain variations in hand preference.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
13.9K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
13.9K
What is a Species?
50.4K
Overview
50.4K
Keystone Species
24.9K
Measures of species biodiversity, such as richness (i.e., the number of species present) and evenness (i.e., their relative abundance), describe an ecological community’s structure. Many factors affect community structure, including abiotic factors (e.g., sunlight and nutrients), disturbances (e.g., fire or flood), species interactions (e.g., predation or competition), and chance events (e.g., foreign species invasion). Certain species—such as keystone species—also play a...
24.9K
Formation of Species
45.3K
Speciation describes the formation of one or more new species from one or sometimes multiple original species. The resulting species are discrete from the parent species, and barriers to reproduction will typically exist. There are two primary mechanisms, speciation with and without geographic isolation—allopatric and sympatric speciation, respectively.
45.3K
Hand hygiene
6.0K
Asepsis is the practice of preventing or breaking the chain of infection. The nurse employs aseptic techniques to prevent the spread of microorganisms and reduce the risk of diseases. Hand hygiene is the cornerstone of aseptic techniques and is classified into medical and surgical asepsis. Medical asepsis includes hand hygiene and the use of gloves. Surgical asepsis, or the sterile technique, refers to practices that render and keep objects and areas free of microorganisms.
Hand washing...
Hand washing...
6.0K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference
5.7K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.7K

