Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women

William A Grobman¹, Madeline M Rice¹, Uma M Reddy¹+20

• ¹From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G., G.M.); University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (R.M.S., K.H.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); Columbia University, New York (A.P.-D.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.) - all in Texas; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (K.A.B.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; Ohio State University, Columbus (J.D.I.), and MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.) - both in Ohio; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.K.S.); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.) - both in Pennsylvania; Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.); the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (M.M.R., E.A.T.); and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.).